Influence of the host matrix of the enzyme in the performance of amperometric biosensors

Abstract In this work we present a comparative study of four amperometric biosensors of phenol prepared by means of immobilization of tyrosinase in organic and inorganic matrices. The immobilization within organic matrices consisted on enzyme entrapped in both polyacrylamide microgels, and polyvinylimidazole microparticles. On the other hand, two inorganic matrices were investigated: a laponite clay and the calcium phosphate cement, brushite. The enzyme was absorbed on these inorganic matrices and subsequently was cross-linked by glutaraldehyde. The detection of phenolic compounds was performed in aqueous and organic media by direct electrochemical reduction of the enzymatic product, o-quinone, at −0.1 V versus SCE. The large differences found in biosensors performance are attributed to the environment surrounding the enzyme, or the biomaterial layers used in the fabrication of the biosensor. Sensors based on inorganic matrices provided the best results in detection of monophenols and catechol in aqueous solution, being the biosensor of brushite the most sensitive device ( S  = 46 A M −1  cm −2 ) with the lowest detection limit (DL = 3 nM). On organic media (acetonitrile, dioxane, and ethanol), the optimum catechol detection was achieved with both, biosensors based on brushite ( S  = 3.3 A M −1  cm −2 , DL = 40 nM) and also with biosensors prepared with polyvinylimidazole microparticles (S = 12.5 mA M −1  cm −2 , DL = 8 μM).

[1]  Andrew J Lamb,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids , 2005, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

[2]  C. Stalikas Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids. , 2007, Journal of separation science.

[3]  K. Söderhäll,et al.  Isolation and Partial Purification of Prophenoloxidase from Daucus carota L. Cell Cultures. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[4]  J P Hervás Pérez,et al.  Amperometric tyrosinase biosensor based on polyacrylamide microgels. , 2006, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  E. Erhan,et al.  Enzyme based phenol biosensors , 2011 .

[6]  J. Gavarri,et al.  Proton mobilities in brushite and brushite/polymer composites , 1997 .

[7]  Seyed Mehdi Borghei,et al.  The treatment of phenolic wastewater using a moving bed biofilm reactor , 2004 .

[8]  H. Ju,et al.  Pure Organic Phase Phenol Biosensor Based on Tyrosinase Entrapped in a Vapor Deposited Titania Sol‐Gel Membrane , 2004 .

[9]  J. Retama,et al.  Microstructural modifications induced by the entrapped glucose oxidase in cross-linked polyacrylamide microgels used as glucose sensors. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  M Sánchez-Paniagua López,et al.  Highly sensitive amperometric biosensor based on a biocompatible calcium phosphate cement. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[11]  S. Cosnier,et al.  A comparison of amperometric screen-printed, carbon electrodes and their application to the analysis of phenolic compounds present in beers. , 2001, Talanta.

[12]  C. Rice-Evans,et al.  Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds , 1997 .

[13]  Seema Bhagwat,et al.  Profiling methods for the determination of phenolic compounds in foods and dietary supplements , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[14]  J. L. Weaver,et al.  Subunit structure of glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger. , 1972, Biochemistry.

[15]  P. Labbé,et al.  Amplification of amperometric biosensor responses by electrochemical substrate recycling: Part I. Theoretical treatment of the catechol–polyphenol oxidase system , 1999 .

[16]  S. Cosnier,et al.  Organic phase PPO biosensor based on hydrophilic films of electropolymerized polypyrrole , 2005 .

[17]  M. S. López,et al.  Organic phase enzyme electrodes. , 2006, Biomolecular engineering.

[18]  Chi-Tang Ho,et al.  Phenolic compounds in food and their effects on health II: antioxidants and cancer prevention. , 1992 .

[19]  C. Mousty,et al.  Biosensing applications of clay-modified electrodes: a review , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[20]  J. Retama,et al.  Biosensors based on acrylic microgels: a comparative study of immobilized glucose oxidase and tyrosinase. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[21]  G. Dusting,et al.  Natural phenolic compounds as cardiovascular therapeutics: potential role of their antiinflammatory effects. , 2003, Current vascular pharmacology.

[22]  J N Rodríguez-López,et al.  Tyrosinase: a comprehensive review of its mechanism. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  M. S. López,et al.  Biosensors Based on Poly(vinylimidazole) Microparticles , 2009 .

[24]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[25]  C. Laane,et al.  Rules for optimization of biocatalysis in organic solvents , 1987, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  M. S. López,et al.  Amperometric Biosensors Based on Choline Oxidase Entrapped in Polyacrylamide Microgels , 2007 .

[27]  J. Nicell,et al.  Characterization of tyrosinase for the treatment of aqueous phenols , 2000 .

[28]  Marta Sánchez-Paniagua López,et al.  Rutin Determination at an Amperometric Biosensor , 2007 .

[29]  Maria-José U. Ferreira,et al.  Phenolic compounds as selective antineoplasic agents against multidrug-resistant human cancer cells. , 2010, Planta medica.

[30]  D. Barceló,et al.  Surface water analysis (trace-organic contaminants) and EC regulations , 1994 .

[31]  J. Luong,et al.  A substrate recycling assay for phenolic compounds using tyrosinase and NADH. , 1994, Analytical biochemistry.