Interfacial conditions between a press-fit acetabular cup and bone during daily activities: implications for achieving bone in-growth.

[1]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M. Aliabadi,et al.  Bone remodelling using sensitivity analysis. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. Szmukler‐Moncler,et al.  Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  C. Bragdon,et al.  Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  M. Ries,et al.  Effect of cementless acetabular cup geometry on strain distribution and press-fit stability. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  W. Maloney,et al.  A quantitative in vitro assessment of fit and screw fixation on the stability of a cementless hemispherical acetabular component. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  E. Schneider,et al.  The effect of interfacial parameters on cup-bone relative micromotions. A finite element investigation. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. Brown,et al.  Areas of contact and extent of gaps with implantation of oversized acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.