Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was created to evaluate costs and health outcomes. The model's robustness was evaluated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Serplulimab demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $104,537.375/quality-adjusted life-year in the overall population group. Subgroup analysis showed that serplulimab had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $261,750.496/quality-adjusted life-year and $68,107.997/quality-adjusted life-year in the populations with PD-L1 1 ≤ combined positive score <10 and PD-L1 combined positive score ≥10, respectively. Conclusion: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of serplulimab therapy were found to exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,304.34. Thus, serplulimab is not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

[1]  K. Athanasakis,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Economic Evaluations of Immuno-Oncology Drugs: A Systematic Literature Review. , 2023, Value in health regional issues.

[2]  Wangqing Chen,et al.  Global trends in the health economics field of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A bibliometric and visualized study , 2023, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[3]  G. Qiu,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in China , 2023, Current medical research and opinion.

[4]  Hao Jiang,et al.  First-line serplulimab or placebo plus chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial , 2023, Nature Medicine.

[5]  R. Malekzadeh,et al.  Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer , 2023, Cancers.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2023 , 2023, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Lingli Zhang,et al.  Impact of the national drug price negotiation policy on the utilization, cost, and accessibility of anticancer medicines in China: A controlled interrupted time series study , 2022, Journal of global health.

[8]  Qingfeng Wu,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[9]  Ying-Ying Zhang,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first‐line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer , 2022, Cancer medicine.

[10]  Liu Yang,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy for patients with previously treated mismatch repair proficient advanced endometrial cancer in China , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[11]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Effect of First-Line Serplulimab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The ASTRUM-005 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2022, JAMA.

[12]  Ling Fang,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[13]  Mingsheng Chen,et al.  Socioeconomic inequality in health care use among cancer patients in China: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[14]  T. Friede,et al.  A Guide to Selecting Flexible Survival Models to Inform Economic Evaluations of Cancer Immunotherapies. , 2022, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  R. Zheng,et al.  The survival of esophageal cancer by subtype in China with comparison to the United States , 2022, International journal of cancer.

[16]  T. Leong,et al.  Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2022, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  Zehua Song,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab combination therapy in the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[18]  Arnold Lee Serplulimab: First Approval , 2022, Drugs.

[19]  Luwen Shi,et al.  Prices and Clinical Benefit of National Price-Negotiated Anticancer Medicines in China , 2022, PharmacoEconomics.

[20]  Jingrong Lin,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or More , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[21]  L. Kong,et al.  Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial , 2022, BMJ.

[22]  Yawen Jiang,et al.  Policy Updates on Access to and Affordability of Innovative Medicines in China. , 2022, Value in health regional issues.

[23]  R. Zheng,et al.  Gastric and esophageal cancer in China 2000 to 2030: Recent trends and short‐term predictions of the future burden , 2022, Cancer medicine.

[24]  Maobai Liu,et al.  First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis , 2022, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[25]  Qilin Zhang,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab vs. Placebo Added to Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[26]  Kelvin K. W. Chan,et al.  Examining the association between oncology drug clinical benefit and the time to public reimbursement , 2021, Cancer medicine.

[27]  Hengjin Dong,et al.  The Disease and Economic Burdens of Esophageal Cancer in China from 2013 to 2030: Dynamic Cohort Modeling Study , 2021, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[28]  Yun-Ju Huang,et al.  Structural basis of HLX10 PD-1 receptor recognition, a promising anti-PD-1 antibody clinical candidate for cancer immunotherapy , 2021, PloS one.

[29]  P. Puri,et al.  A time series analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the United States Medicare population: 2014–2019 , 2021, The Journal of dermatological treatment.

[30]  Ruihua Xu,et al.  Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time‐trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020 , 2021, Cancer communications.

[31]  Mingsheng Chen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab in the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China , 2021, Annals of translational medicine.

[32]  B. Gyawali,et al.  Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Submitted for Reimbursement Recommendation Decisions in Canada. , 2021, JAMA internal medicine.

[33]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[34]  Yi Liu,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. , 2021, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[35]  J. Guo,et al.  Current Development and Practice of Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation Guidelines for Universal Health Coverage in China. , 2020, Value in health regional issues.

[36]  Chongqing Tan,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as a second-line therapy for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal cancer in China , 2020, PLoS ONE.

[37]  Edward L. Giovannucci,et al.  Global Burden of 5 Major Types Of Gastrointestinal Cancer. , 2020, Gastroenterology.

[38]  J. Hoch,et al.  A Comparison of Different Analysis Methods for Reconstructed Survival Data to Inform Cost‑Effectiveness Analysis , 2019, PharmacoEconomics.

[39]  Quan P. Ly,et al.  Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[40]  W. Henley,et al.  Improved curve fits to summary survival data: application to economic evaluation of health technologies , 2011, BMC Medical Research Methodology.