Attending and resident satisfaction with feedback in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES Effective feedback is critical to medical education. Little is known about emergency medicine (EM) attending and resident physician perceptions of feedback. The focus of this study was to examine perceptions of the educational feedback that attending physicians give to residents in the clinical environment of the emergency department (ED). The authors compared attending and resident satisfaction with real-time feedback and hypothesized that the two groups would report different overall satisfaction with the feedback they currently give and receive in the ED. METHODS This observational study surveyed attending and resident physicians at 17 EM residency programs through web-based surveys. The primary outcome was overall satisfaction with feedback in the ED, ranked on a 10-point scale. Additional survey items addressed specific aspects of feedback. Responses were compared using a linear generalized estimating equation (GEE) model for overall satisfaction, a logistic GEE model for dichotomized responses, and an ordinal logistic GEE model for ordinal responses. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-three of 525 (71%) attending physicians and 356 of 596 (60%) residents completed the survey. Attending physicians were more satisfied with overall feedback (mean score 5.97 vs. 5.29, p < 0.001) and with timeliness of feedback (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23 to 2.00; p < 0.001) than residents. Attending physicians were also more likely to rate the quality of feedback as very good or excellent for positive feedback, constructive feedback, feedback on procedures, documentation, management of ED flow, and evidence-based decision-making. Attending physicians reported time constraints as the top obstacle to giving feedback and were more likely than residents to report that feedback is usually attending initiated (OR = 7.09, 95% CI = 3.53 to 14.31; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Attending physician satisfaction with the quality, timeliness, and frequency of feedback given is higher than resident physician satisfaction with feedback received. Attending and resident physicians have differing perceptions of who initiates feedback and how long it takes to provide effective feedback. Knowledge of these differences in perceptions about feedback may be used to direct future educational efforts to improve feedback in the ED.

[1]  J. Neher,et al.  A Five-Step “Microskills” Model Of Clinical Teaching , 1992, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[2]  J. Ende Feedback in clinical medical education. , 1983, JAMA.

[3]  C. Manifold,et al.  360-degree feedback: possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  Richard B Ismach,et al.  Teaching evidence-based medicine to medical students. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  G. Bandiera,et al.  Improving communication skills: feedback from faculty and residents. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  M. Hewson,et al.  Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. , 1998, Journal of general internal medicine.

[7]  M. Schull,et al.  Emergency department crowding: the effect on resident education. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  O W Hayes,et al.  Assessing the New General Competencies for Resident Education: A Model from an Emergency Medicine Program , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  D. M. Elnicki,et al.  Oral versus written feedback in medical clinic , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  D M Irby,et al.  Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  G. Bandiera,et al.  What do emergency medicine learners want from their teachers? A multicenter focus group analysis. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[13]  C. Olney,et al.  An encounter card system for increasing feedback to students. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[14]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[15]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition , 1989 .

[16]  G. Bandiera,et al.  Creating effective learning in today's emergency departments: how accomplished teachers get it done. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.