The Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration constant flux for assessing particulate/colloidal fouling of RO systems

Reliable methods for measuring and predicting the fouling potential of reverse osmosis (RO) feed water are important in preventing and diagnosing fouling at the design stage, and for monitoring pre-treatment performance during plant operation. The Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (MFI-UF) constant flux is a significant development with respect to assessing the fouling potential of RO feed water. This research investigates (1) the variables influencing the MFI-UF test at constant flux filtration (membrane pore size, membrane material, flux rate); and (2) the application of MFI-UF into pre-treatment assessment and RO fouling estimation. The dependency of MFI on flux, means that to assess accurately particulate fouling in RO systems, the MFI should be measured at a flux similar to a RO system (close to 20 L/m2/h) or extrapolated from higher fluxes. The two studied membrane materials showed reproducible results; 10% for PES membranes and 6.3% for RC membranes. Deposition factors (amount of particles that remain on the surface of membrane) were measured in a full-scale plant ranging between 0.2 and 0.5. The concept of “safe MFI” is presented as a guideline for assessing pre-treatment for RO systems.

[1]  Maria D. Kennedy,et al.  Applications of the MFI-UF to measure and predict particulate fouling in RO systems , 2003 .

[2]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  Predicting flux decline of reverse osmosis membranes , 1981 .

[3]  Zeyad S. Tarawneh,et al.  The MFI-UF as a water quality test and monitor , 2003 .

[4]  W. Pronk,et al.  Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. , 2007, Water research.

[5]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Assessment of silt density index (SDI) as fouling propensity parameter in reverse osmosis (RO) desalination systems , 2013 .

[6]  G. Amy,et al.  The role of inorganic ions in the calcium carbonate scaling of seawater reverse osmosis systems , 2012 .

[7]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Determination of membrane pore size distribution using the fractional rejection of nonionic and charged macromolecules , 2002 .

[8]  G. Belfort,et al.  Photochemical modification of 10 kDa polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for reduction of biofouling , 1999 .

[9]  C. Guéguen,et al.  Organic colloid separation in contrasting aquatic environments with tangential flow filtration. , 2002, Water research.

[10]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  Colloidal fouling of RO membranes: an overview of key issues and efforts to develop improved prediction techniques , 2005 .

[11]  W. P. Ball,et al.  NANOFILTRATION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER: pH AND IONIC STRENGTH EFFECTS , 1997 .

[12]  The surface structure of cake formed by uniform-sized rigid spheroids in cake filtration , 1996 .

[13]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water , 1980 .

[14]  M. Kennedy,et al.  Three years operational experience with ultrafiltration as SWRO pre-treatment during algal bloom , 2013 .

[15]  Maria D. Kennedy,et al.  Development of the MFI-UF in constant flux filtration , 2004 .

[16]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  The influence of membrane properties on the Silt Density Index , 2011 .

[17]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[18]  S. Boerlage,et al.  Scaling and Particulate Fouling in Membrane Filtration Systems , 2001 .

[19]  Vicki Chen,et al.  Investigations of the coupled effect of cake-enhanced osmotic pressure and colloidal fouling in RO using crossflow sampler-modified fouling index ultrafiltration , 2011 .

[20]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane , 2000 .

[21]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Effect of testing conditions and filtration mechanisms on SDI , 2011 .

[22]  A. J. Karabelas,et al.  Toward improvement of methods for predicting fouling of desalination membranes — The effect of permeate flux on specific fouling resistance , 2014 .

[23]  B. Ruth.  Studies in Filtration III. Derivation of General Filtration Equations , 1935 .

[24]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  A. Nahrstedt,et al.  New insights into silt density index and modified fouling index measurements , 2008 .