A double-blind, prospective, randomized, multicenter group comparison study of iopromide 240 vs iohexol 240 in myelography

[1]  D. Kristoffersen,et al.  Myelography with a dimeric (iodixanol) and a monomeric (iohexol) contrast medium: a clinical multicentre comparative study , 1998, European Radiology.

[2]  S. B. Peterman.  Postmyelography headache: a review. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  C. de Haën,et al.  Neurotolerability of nonionic X-ray contrast media. The role of chemotoxicity. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[4]  D. Scherrer,et al.  Neurotoxicity of non-ionic X-ray contrast media after intracisternal administration in rats. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[5]  P. Sundgren,et al.  Adverse reactions in myelography. , 1995, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[6]  A. Osborn,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Iopromide in Cerebral Arteriography , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[7]  C. Jensen,et al.  A prospective comparison of iotrolan and iohexol in lumbar myelography. , 1994, Acta radiologica.

[8]  D. Yealy,et al.  Post-dural-puncture headache: characteristics, management, and prevention. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  V. Kornienko,et al.  [Experience in using the new nonionic x-ray contrast medium Ultravist in neuroroentgenology]. , 1993, Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko.

[10]  J. Stevens,et al.  Post‐lumbar puncture headaches , 1992, Neurology.

[11]  Hess Jh.  Postdural puncture headache: a literature review. , 1991 .

[12]  A Whitehead,et al.  A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  J. Hess.  Postdural puncture headache: a literature review. , 1991, AANA journal.

[14]  D. Sobel,et al.  Adverse Reactions to Iopamidol and Iohexol Myelography with Special Attention to Headache: Role of Myelographic Technique , 1989, Headache.

[15]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical trials with iotrolan in myelographic and computed tomography applications in the United States. , 1989, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[16]  K. Ringel,et al.  Iotrolan versus iopamidol: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind study of lumbar and direct cervical myelography. , 1989, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[17]  S. Bień,et al.  Iotrolan, a nonionic dimeric contrast medium in myelography. , 1989, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[18]  S. Wende,et al.  Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. , 1989, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[19]  K. Nestvold,et al.  Lumbar myelography with iohexol. Adverse effects compared with spinal puncture. , 1988, Acta radiologica.

[20]  S. Ekholm,et al.  High-dose iohexol myelography. , 1987, Radiology.

[21]  I. Kuuliala,et al.  Adverse reactions after iohexol lumbar myelography: influence of postprocedural positioning. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J. Hoe,et al.  A comparison of iohexol and iopamidol for lumbar myelography. , 1986, Clinical radiology.

[23]  R. Bartlett,et al.  A prospective comparison of iotrolan, iohexol and iopamidol for lumbar myelography. , 1986, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[24]  J. Lamb.  Iohexol vs. iopamidol for myelography. , 1985, Investigative radiology.