Establishing Cephalometric Landmarks for the Translational Study of Le Fort–Based Facial Transplantation in Swine: Enhanced Applications Using Computer-Assisted Surgery and Custom Cutting Guides

Background: Le Fort–based, maxillofacial allotransplantation is a reconstructive alternative gaining clinical acceptance. However, the vast majority of single-jaw transplant recipients demonstrate less-than-ideal skeletal and dental relationships, with suboptimal aesthetic harmony. The purpose of this study was to investigate reproducible cephalometric landmarks in a large-animal model, where refinement of computer-assisted planning, intraoperative navigational guidance, translational bone osteotomies, and comparative surgical techniques could be performed. Methods: Cephalometric landmarks that could be translated into the human craniomaxillofacial skeleton, and that would remain reliable following maxillofacial osteotomies with midfacial alloflap inset, were sought on six miniature swine. Le Fort I– and Le Fort III–based alloflaps were harvested in swine with osteotomies, and all alloflaps were either autoreplanted or transplanted. Cephalometric analyses were performed on lateral cephalograms preoperatively and postoperatively. Critical cephalometric data sets were identified with the assistance of surgical planning and virtual prediction software and evaluated for reliability and translational predictability. Results: Several pertinent landmarks and human analogues were identified, including pronasale, zygion, parietale, gonion, gnathion, lower incisor base, and alveolare. Parietale-pronasale-alveolare and parietale-pronasale–lower incisor base were found to be reliable correlates of sellion-nasion–A point angle and sellion-nasion–B point angle measurements in humans, respectively. Conclusions: There is a set of reliable cephalometric landmarks and measurement angles pertinent for use within a translational large-animal model. These craniomaxillofacial landmarks will enable development of novel navigational software technology, improve cutting guide designs, and facilitate exploration of new avenues for investigation and collaboration.

[1]  M. Swindle,et al.  Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery/Chronic Intravascular Catheterization , 2015 .

[2]  E. Fishman,et al.  Overcoming Cross-Gender Differences and Challenges in Le Fort–Based, Craniomaxillofacial Transplantation With Enhanced Computer-Assisted Technology , 2013, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  E. Rodriguez,et al.  Total Face, Double Jaw, and Tongue Transplantation: An Evolutionary Concept , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Thomas M. Scalea,et al.  Total Face, Double Jaw, and Tongue Transplant Research Procurement: An Educational Model , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  E. Rodriguez,et al.  Total Face, Double Jaw, and Tongue Transplant Simulation: A Cadaveric Study Using Computer-Assisted Techniques , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Intraoperative Image-based Multiview 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery: Incorporation of Fiducial-Based C-Arm Tracking and GPU-Acceleration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Leonard B Kaban,et al.  Le Fort–Based Maxillofacial Transplantation: Current State of the Art and a Refined Technique Using Orthognathic Applications , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  Leonard B Kaban,et al.  Osteocutaneous Maxillofacial Allotransplantation: Lessons Learned from a Novel Cadaver Study Applying Orthognathic Principles and Practice , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  B. Pomahac,et al.  Restoration of Facial Form and Function After Severe Disfigurement from Burn Injury by a Composite Facial Allograft , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[10]  J. Glowacki,et al.  A minipig model of maxillary distraction osteogenesis. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  B. Balas,et al.  Evaluation of appearance transfer and persistence in central face transplantation: a computer simulation analysis. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[12]  S. Schneeberger,et al.  The World's Experience With Facial Transplantation: What Have We Learned Thus Far? , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  J. Fung,et al.  Near-total human face transplantation for a severely disfigured patient in the USA , 2009, The Lancet.

[14]  D. Minhas,et al.  Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[15]  J. Zins,et al.  A New Composite Facial and Scalp Transplantation Model in Rats , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  L. Farkas,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the morphology of the pig's head used as a model in surgical experimentation. Part 1: Methods of Measurements. , 1976, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[18]  L. Farkas,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the morphology of the pig's head used as a model in surgical experimentation part 2: results of measurements. , 1977, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.