Global bridge damage detection using multi-sensor data based on optimized functional echo state networks

While machine learning has been increasingly incorporated into structural damage detection, most existing methods still rely on hand-crafted damage features. For a given structure, the performance of detection is heavily impacted by the quality of features, and choosing the optimal features may be difficult and time-consuming. Various time series classification algorithms studied in machine learning are able to classify structural responses into damage conditions without feature engineering; however, most of them only deal with univariate time series classification and are either inapplicable or ineffective on multivariate (i.e. multi-dimensional) data, thus unable to fully utilize all sensors available on real bridges. To address these limitations, we propose a global bridge damage detection method based on multivariate time series classification with optimized functional echo state networks. In this method, data from multiple sensors are directly used as inputs without feature extraction. Training of the functional echo state network is simple and straightforward, and by leveraging the nonlinear mapping capacity and dynamic memory of functional echo state network, the separability of different classes, that is, classifying accuracy is enhanced compared to conventional classification algorithms. Furthermore, hyperparameters of the functional echo state network are automatically optimized with particle swarm optimization algorithm, which further improves the accuracy while saving the cost of manual tuning. Experimental results on two classical data sets show that functional echo state network achieves high and stable accuracy, which indicate that our method can detect global bridge structural damage efficiently by analyzing multiple sensor data, and is prospected to be applied in real bridge structural health monitoring systems.

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  Modal identification of bridges under varying environmental conditions: Temperature and wind effects , 2009 .

[2]  K. Hjelmstad,et al.  Parameter Estimation of Structures from Static Response. II: Numerical Simulation Studies , 1994 .

[3]  Harald Haas,et al.  Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication , 2004, Science.

[4]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  ARMA modelled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2008 .

[5]  Keith Worden,et al.  Damage identification using support vector machines , 2001 .

[6]  Robert E. Kalaba,et al.  On adaptive control processes , 1959 .

[7]  Feng Gao,et al.  A novel time-domain auto-regressive model for structural damage diagnosis , 2005 .

[8]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Three-Tier Modular Structural Health Monitoring Framework Using Environmental and Operational Condition Clustering for Data Normalization: Validation on an Operational Wind Turbine System , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Blind denoising of structural vibration responses with outliers via principal component pursuit , 2013, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Jiabin Wang,et al.  Functional echo state network for time series classification , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[11]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of the Phase II IASC–ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Experimental Benchmark Data , 2004 .

[12]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage , 1992 .

[13]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Continuous dynamic monitoring of a prestressed concrete bridge based on strain, inclination and crack measurements over a 14-year span , 2018 .

[14]  Zhibin Lin,et al.  Data-driven support vector machine with optimization techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection , 2017, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.

[15]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances , 2016, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[16]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: Verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Yi-Zhou Lin,et al.  Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature‐Extraction through Deep Learning , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[18]  Hui Li,et al.  SMC structural health monitoring benchmark problem using monitored data from an actual cable‐stayed bridge , 2014 .

[19]  Qian-Li Ma,et al.  Modular state space of echo state network , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[20]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Structural health monitoring: technological advances to practical implementations [scanning the issue] , 2016, Proc. IEEE.

[21]  Henry Leung,et al.  Data-driven based model for flow prediction of steam system in steel industry , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring With Autoregressive Support Vector Machines , 2009 .

[23]  Yuan Li,et al.  Rotation-invariant similarity in time series using bag-of-patterns representation , 2012, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[24]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  A Sensor Data Fusion System Based on k-Nearest Neighbor Pattern Classification for Structural Health Monitoring Applications , 2017, Sensors.

[25]  M. M. Reda Taha,et al.  Damage identification for structural health monitoring using fuzzy pattern recognition , 2005 .

[26]  Wang Rong-shi Rehabilitation and Strengthening of Yonghe Bridge in Tianjin , 2009 .

[27]  Adel M. Alimi,et al.  PSO-based analysis of Echo State Network parameters for time series forecasting , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[28]  Shu-Xian Lun,et al.  A new echo state network with variable memory length , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[29]  K. Law,et al.  Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure , 2006 .

[30]  George C. Runger,et al.  A time series forest for classification and feature extraction , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[31]  James L. Beck,et al.  Structural Model Updating and Health Monitoring with Incomplete Modal Data Using Gibbs Sampler , 2006, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[32]  Vit Niennattrakul,et al.  On Clustering Multimedia Time Series Data Using K-Means and Dynamic Time Warping , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (MUE'07).

[33]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[34]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[35]  H. Razeghi,et al.  Detection and Estimation of Damage in Structures Using Imperialist Competitive Algorithm , 2012 .

[36]  Jinping Ou,et al.  The state of the art in structural health monitoring of cable-stayed bridges , 2016 .

[37]  Franco Bontempi,et al.  Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge with Bayesian neural networks , 2015, Design, Assessment, Monitoring and Maintenance of Bridges and Infrastructure Networks.

[38]  Gianluca Ruocci,et al.  Multi-domain feature selection aimed at the damage detection of historical bridges , 2011 .

[39]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Experimental Phase II of the Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem , 2003 .

[40]  Hong Jiang Li The Second Maintenance and Strengthening of Yonghe Bridge , 2011 .

[41]  Yong Huang,et al.  Bayesian compressive sensing for approximately sparse signals and application to structural health monitoring signals for data loss recovery , 2016 .

[42]  Ardeshir Bahreininejad,et al.  Damage detection of truss bridge joints using Artificial Neural Networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[43]  F. J. Soeiro,et al.  Structural damage detection based on static and modal analysis , 1989 .