A statistical modeling approach for evaluating auto-segmentation methods for image-guided radiotherapy

We proposed a statistical modeling method for the quantitative evaluation of segmentation methods used in image guided radiotherapy. A statistical model parameterized on a Beta distribution was built upon the observations of the volume overlap between the segmented structure and the referenced structure. A statistical performance profile (SPP) was then estimated from the model using the generalized maximum likelihood approach. The SPP defines the probability density function characterizing the distribution of performance values and provides a graphical visualization of the segmentation performance. Different segmentation approaches may be influenced by image quality or observer variability. Our statistical model was able to quantify the impact of these variations and displays the underlying statistical performance of the segmentation algorithm. We demonstrated the efficacy of this statistical model using both simulated data and clinical evaluation studies in head and neck radiotherapy. Furthermore, the resulting SPP facilitates the measurement of the correlation between quantitative metrics and clinical experts' decision, and ultimately is able to guide the clinicians in selecting segmentation methods for radiotherapy.

[1]  P. Jaccard THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[2]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[4]  Lei Dong,et al.  Reduce in variation and improve efficiency of target volume delineation by a computer-assisted system using a deformable image registration approach. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  N. Cox Statistical Models in Engineering , 1970 .

[6]  Quan Chen,et al.  Automatic re-contouring in 4D radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Diffuse Prior Monotonic Likelihood Ratio Test for Evaluation of Fused Image Quality Measures , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[13]  L. J. Bain,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics , 1987 .

[14]  Xiao Han,et al.  Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of multiple target volumes and normal tissue (swallowing/mastication) structures in the head and neck. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  O. Commowick,et al.  A pre-clinical assessment of an atlas-based automatic segmentation tool for the head and neck. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Lei Dong,et al.  Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional deformable registration algorithm for targeted prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Atlas-based delineation of lymph node levels in head and neck computed tomography images. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Performance evaluation of automatic anatomy segmentation algorithm on repeat or four-dimensional computed tomography images using deformable image registration method. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  B Haas,et al.  Automatic segmentation of thoracic and pelvic CT images for radiotherapy planning using implicit anatomic knowledge and organ-specific segmentation strategies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Richard K. Moore,et al.  Analysis of Image Quality for Image Fusion via Monotonic Correlation , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[23]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  On the estimation of hyperparameters in Bayesian approach of solving inverse problems , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[24]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Simulating deformations of MR brain images for validation of atlas-based segmentation and registration algorithms , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  J. Fowler,et al.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.