Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students' written discourse about scientific investigations

The purposes of this study were to (a) investigate how one group of middle school students generated meanings for scientific data and expressed them in writing, and (b) develop a methodology for assessing the relationship between students' written text and their scientific thinking. Previous research on writing to learn has focused on the reformulation of content material supplied by the teacher, rather than authentic inquiry data that provide opportunities for meaningful interpretation. The research design was a content analysis of documents produced in a naturalistic setting. Data analysis focused on the frequency, placement, and purpose of meaningful inferences embedded in the reports, as well as coding for the elaboration, extension, and enhancement of science ideas. Results indicated that many student reports included a minimal number of written inferences, expressing only vague meanings for the data. However, some students integrated inference and data, using inference to (a) explain specific meanings for data points in context, and (b) pose new hypotheses to explain data. An analysis of expansion characteristics revealed that some students were able to elaborate richly upon their initial ideas through the use of language, thereby generating new meaning for the investigations. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 36: 1044–1061, 1999

[1]  Nancy J. Fellows.  A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning , 1994 .

[2]  G. Glasson,et al.  Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices , 1993 .

[3]  K. W. Hunt.  Grammatical structures written at three grade levels , 1965 .

[4]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[5]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  How Writing Shapes Thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22. , 1987 .

[6]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[7]  L. Rivard,et al.  A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research , 1994 .

[8]  Carolyn W. Keys.  The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth‐grade students , 1994 .

[9]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[10]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[11]  J. Emig.  Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[12]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[13]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .

[14]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[15]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[16]  James Britton,et al.  Language and Learning , 1970 .

[17]  A. Herrington,et al.  Writing to Learn: Writing across the Disciplines. , 1981 .

[18]  Paul H. Connolly,et al.  Writing to learn mathematics and science , 1989 .

[19]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[20]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Device and Tool Thinking in High Conscription for Social School Science , 1992 .