The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance

This study develops and tests a model of relationships among computer-mediated communication systems (CMCS), group processes, and group outcomes. The group outcomes examined are agreement and acceptance. Agreement is the extent to which members of a problem-solving group hold similar views and solutions about the problem at the end of their task. Acceptance is the extent to which members of a problem-solving group acquiesce to the views and solutions of other members, while holding reservations about those views and solutions. The distinction between agreement and acceptance is important because members in agreement are more likely to support the implementation of their solution than are those who merely accept the solution. Based on a laboratory experiment, we find that socioemotional communication (both positive--showing friendliness and supportiveness--and negative--showing hostility and rejection) as well as task-oriented communication play important mediating roles between CMCS use and acceptance and agreement. The findings suggest ways to promote agreement through management intervention and CMCS design. In addition, our findings suggest some intriguing avenues for further research, such as the lack of symmetry between the effects of positive and negative socioemotional communication.

[1]  H. Wold.  Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares , 1983 .

[2]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Participation, Satisfaction, and Productivity: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1986 .

[3]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[4]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[5]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  Theory and experiment in social communication. , 1950 .

[6]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[7]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[8]  Samuel W. McDowell,et al.  The Validity of Time-Sampling in Group Interactions , 1978 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Internal Dynamics of Cooperative Learning Groups , 1985 .

[10]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[11]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[12]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[13]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[14]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[15]  R. Bagozzi.  An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[18]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[19]  B. Fisher.  Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[20]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[21]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  R. Likert,et al.  New Patterns of Management. , 1963 .

[23]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[24]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Gdss Capabilities on Decision-Making Processes in Groups , 1993 .

[25]  Edward W. Miles,et al.  Organizational Communication in the Information Age: Implications of Computer-Based Systems , 1988 .

[26]  Thomas E. Harris,et al.  Applied organizational communication : perspectives, principles, and pragmatics , 1993 .

[27]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[29]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Social influence effects on remote group interactions , 1995 .

[31]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[32]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[33]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[34]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[35]  John Naisbitt,et al.  Megatrends 2000 : ten new directions for the 1990's , 1990 .

[36]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  S. Weisband.  Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .

[38]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[39]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[40]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[41]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Making , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[42]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[43]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Determinants of support for group decisions , 1978 .

[44]  Michael A. West,et al.  The social psychology of innovation in groups. , 1990 .

[45]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .