Dynamic reliability framework for a Nuclear Power Plant using dynamic flowgraph methodology

Abstract Passive safety systems are being considered in advanced reactor designs to provide inherent stability for the operation of the nuclear reactor. Passive shutdown is provided for guaranteed removal of decay heat under emergency conditions. The reliability of such systems should be very high. The static reliability assessment of such systems has been considered using various techniques such as fault tree analysis, failure mode effect analysis, and reliability block diagrams. Dynamic reliability methods are powerful mathematical frameworks capable of handling interactions among components and process variables explicitly. In principle, they constitute a more realistic modelling of systems for the purposes of reliability, risk and safety analysis. Although there is a growing recognition in the risk community of the potentially greater correctness of these methods, no serious effort has been undertaken to utilize them in industrial applications. The dynamic flowgraph methodology is an integrated methodological approach to modelling and analyzing the behavior of software-driven embedded systems for the purpose of reliability/safety assessment and verification. In the present work, dynamic flowgraph methodology has been used to analyze the Station Blackout Scenario for a Nuclear Power Plant. The benefits of the proposed method are brought out with respect to the traditional methods like fault tree analysis, which deteriorates in applicability with increasing system size and complexity and fails to accommodate the dynamics of the system. The proposed method has been validated on the passive residual heat removal system of pressurized heavy water reactor.

[1]  Gopika Vinod,et al.  Design Verification of Instrumentation and Control Systems of Nuclear Power Plants , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  V Saenko,et al.  The Chernobyl accident and its consequences. , 2011, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[3]  Timothy Abram,et al.  Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science , 2008 .

[4]  Kim Björkman,et al.  Solving dynamic flowgraph methodology models using binary decision diagrams , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Anil Kakodkar,et al.  Design and development of the AHWR—the Indian thorium fuelled innovative nuclear reactor , 2006 .

[6]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  The dynamic flowgraph methodology for assessing the dependability of embedded software systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  R. P. Vijuk,et al.  The AP1000TM Reactor: Passive Safety and Modular Design , 2011 .

[8]  Mohammad Modarres,et al.  Reliability engineering and risk analysis : a practical guide , 2016 .

[9]  Fumiya Tanabe,et al.  Analysis of Core Melt Accident in Fukushima Daiichi-Unit 1 Nuclear Reactor , 2011 .

[10]  Fayyaz Ahmed Probabilistic Risk Assessment Using Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology for Copper Chloride CANDU-SCWR Hydrogen Production , 2013, ANT/SEIT.

[11]  A. Manish Tripathi,et al.  Dynamic reliability analysis framework for passive safety systems of Nuclear Power Plant , 2020, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[12]  S. S. Bajaj,et al.  Tarapur Atomic Power Station Units-1 and 2: Design features, operating experience and license renewal , 2006 .

[13]  Alok Mishra,et al.  The VVERs at KudanKulam , 2006 .

[14]  Wei-Ho Chung,et al.  Cyberphysical Security and Dependability Analysis of Digital Control Systems in Nuclear Power Plants , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[15]  R. K. Sinha,et al.  Role of passive systems in advanced reactors , 2007 .

[16]  A. John Arul,et al.  Functional reliability analysis of Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System of Indian 500 MWe PFBR , 2008 .

[17]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Quantitative Dependability Analysis of Safety-Critical and Control Systems of NPP , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  Luciano Burgazzi,et al.  Passive System Reliability Analysis: A Study on the Isolation Condenser , 2002 .

[19]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Sarah J. Dunnett,et al.  Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams , 2000, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[21]  John Cleveland,et al.  IAEA activities on passive safety systems and overview of international development , 2000 .

[22]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Station Blackouts in Nuclear Power Plants , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[23]  Lalit Kumar Singh,et al.  Dependability Analysis of Safety Critical Real-Time Systems by Using Petri Nets , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[24]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Model Event/Fault Trees With Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Better Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.