Picturizing science The science documentary as multimedia spectacle

At the turn of the millennium, science documentaries show a particular penchant for the abundant use of animated visuals, obviously facilitated by new digital television techniques such as videographic animation and computer animatronics. Analyzing two recent science documentary series (Walking with Dinosaurs and The Elegant Universe) this article discusses how scientists and television producers deploy digital animation to convince viewers of the plausibility of scientific theories in the fields of paleontology and physics. The question guiding these analyses is how the use of digital animation is grounded in ambiguous epistemological and ontological claims. Rather than lamenting the advancing pictorial effect and the demise of realism in ‘postmodern' science documentaries, it is argued that the multimedia mix of words, sounds and images both reflects and transforms our claims to knowledge. In fact, science documentaries do not illustrate but enablescientific claims; they visualize knowledge while substa...

[1]  A. White,et al.  Unnatural History? Deconstructing the Walking with Dinosaurs Phenomenon , 2003 .

[2]  S. Franklin Life story: The gene as fetish object on TV , 1988 .

[3]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[4]  S. Schweber,et al.  Instruments and the imagination , 1998, Nature.

[5]  J. Durlak The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[6]  Susanna Hornig,et al.  Television's 'Nova' and the construction of scientific truth , 1990 .

[7]  Cristopher Nash Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy and Literature , 1994 .

[8]  David R. Topper,et al.  7. Towards an Epistemology of Scientific Illustration , 1996 .

[9]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[10]  Michael P. Jeffries BBC NATURAL HISTORY VERSUS SCIENCE PARADIGMS , 2003 .

[11]  Sean Cubitt,et al.  The Cinema Effect , 2004 .

[12]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  How images think , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  J. Corner Performing the Real , 2002 .

[14]  John Corner,et al.  Paula Rabinowitz, They Must Be Represented: the Politics of Documentary; Brian Winston, Claiming the Real: the Documentary Film Revisited , 1996 .

[15]  José van Dijck,et al.  Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics , 1998 .

[16]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Representation in Scientific Practice , 1990 .

[17]  Tim Haines,et al.  Walking with beasts , 2002, SIGGRAPH '02.

[18]  Scott Frank,et al.  REEL REALITY: Science Consultants in Hollywood , 2003 .

[19]  Brian S. Baigrie,et al.  Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science , 1996 .

[20]  M. Cartmill Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science , 1991, International Journal of Primatology.

[21]  Cynni Murphy The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post‐photographic era , 1993 .

[22]  H J Morowitz,et al.  The secret of life. , 1995, Hospital practice.

[23]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Framing Science: The Making of a BBC Documentary , 1985 .

[24]  Andrew Darley Simulating Natural History: Walking with Dinosaurs as Hyper-Real Edutainment , 2003 .

[25]  B. Latour We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[26]  José van Dijck,et al.  The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging , 2005 .

[27]  B. Crowther Viewing what comes naturally: A feminist approach to television natural history , 1997 .