Application of pesticide simulation models to the Vredepeel dataset: I. Water, solute and heat transport

The performance of 10 deterministic one-dimensional dynamic pesticide leaching models with different complexity was evaluated using data collected on a humic sandy soil with a shallow ground water table in the Netherlands. Both mechanistic models, based on the solution of the governing How equations (the Richards equation for soil water and the convection dispersion equation for solute flow) and functional, more empirical models were considered in the analysis. Simulations were carried out by 18 modellers allowing the characterisation of model performance in terms of user specific model parameterisation. Both uncalibrated and calibrated results are presented which demonstrate the impact of model calibrations on modelling results. In this paper, the ability of the models to correctly represent the physical transport processes is evaluated, while in a subsequent paper (Tiktak, 2000. Agric. Water Manage. Vol. 44, pp 119-134), the potential of the models to represent pesticide fate correctly will be assessed. Model calibration had a major impact on the simulation of water flow in soils. In general, after calibration, the Richards' type models were superior to the capacity type models. However, user-specific hydraulic parameter estimation procedures introduce considerable variability in model performance which sometimes overrules conceptual model differences (Richards'/capacity). The evaluation of the solute transport component of the models was inhibited by the lack of reliable tracer data. Heat transport modelling in the top soil was not felt as being a bottleneck in our modelling technology. A plea is made for developing good modelling practices in which guidelines for selecting robust parameter estimation methods are defined. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  T. R. Roberts,et al.  Environmental behaviour of agrochemicals , 1995 .

[2]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Preferential flow mechanism in a water repellent sandy soil , 1993 .

[3]  N. J. Jarvis,et al.  Sources of error in model predictions of pesticide leaching: a case study using the MACRO model , 2000 .

[4]  J.J.T.I. Boesten,et al.  Testing PESTLA using two modellers for bentazone and ethoprophos in a sandy soil , 2000 .

[5]  J. Boesten Simulation of bentazon leaching in sandy loam soil from mellby (Sweden) with the pestla model , 1994 .

[6]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  Validity of agroecosystem models a comparison of results of different models applied to the same data set , 1995 .

[7]  A. Tiktak Application of pesticide leaching models to the Vredepeel dataset: II Pesticide fate , 2000 .

[8]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  A European test of pesticide-leaching models: methodology and major recommendations , 2000 .

[9]  J.J.T.I. Boesten,et al.  Modeller subjectivity in estimating pesticide parameters for leaching models using the same laboratory data set , 2000 .

[10]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Simulation of water and solute transport in field soils with the LEACHP model , 2000 .

[11]  J.J.T.I. Boesten,et al.  Movement of water, bromide and the pesticides ethoprophos and bentazone in a sandy soil: the Vredepeel data set , 2000 .

[12]  A. M. Linden,et al.  Application of the Pesticide Transport Assessment model to a field study in a humic sandy soil in Vredepeel, The Netherlands , 1998 .