A new way to use transit-time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES Transit-time flow measurement is a recognized method for graft evaluation in coronary surgery. However, single flow measurement has been associated with a low specificity for detecting graft dysfunction. The goal of this study was to assess the value of transit-time flow measurement for assessing in situ internal mammary artery grafts during non-existent native coronary circulation and the relevance of collateral blood flow in target vessels. METHODS Between 2014 and 2018, a total of 134 patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were evaluated using transit-time flow measurement. We analysed 111 single left internal mammary artery and 57 single right internal mammary artery bypasses. Correlations between coronary relevant parameters were calculated using Spearman's ρ coefficient. Risk factors for decreased flow with an arrested heart (FAH) <30 ml/min and an increased pulsatility index (PI) >3.0 as well as flow reduction >30% were calculated. RESULTS FAH correlated with the diameter of the target vessel (Spearman's ρ = 0.32; P < 0.001), the amount of blood distribution (Spearman's ρ = 0.34; P < 0.001), the PI (Spearman's ρ = 0.19; P = 0.019) and the degree of stenosis (Spearman's ρ = -0.17; P = 0.042). The percentage of flow change was found to correlate with the PI (Spearman's ρ = -0.47; P < 0.0001), the degree of stenosis (Spearman's ρ = 0.42; P < 0.001), the diameter of the target vessel (Spearman's ρ = -0.22; P = 0.008) and the area of blood distribution (Spearman's ρ = -0.19; P = 0.018). A small blood distribution area was the only risk factor for decreased FAH [odds ratio (OR) 8.43, confidence interval (CI) 95% (3.04-23.41); P < 0.001]. Binary logistic regression identified PI [OR 2.05, CI 95% (1.36-3.10); P = 0.001], FAH [OR 0.98, CI 95% (0.97-0.99); P = 0.005] and degree of stenosis [OR 0.95, CI 95% (0.92-0.99); P = 0.011] as risk factors for decreased flow after cardiopulmonary bypass (<30 ml/min). An increased PI (>3) was mainly influenced by percentage of flow change [OR 0.99, CI 95% (0.98-1.00); P = 0.031]. CONCLUSIONS FAH and percentage of flow change are related to the dimensions of the target vessel and the degree of stenosis. The addition of flow measurements with the heart arrested provides additional information about the bypass graft, the quality of the anastomosis and the physiology of the coronary circulation.

[1]  C. V. van Mieghem,et al.  Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. The GRAFFITI trial. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Glineur,et al.  Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial. , 2019, European heart journal.

[3]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  E. Barbato,et al.  Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  T. Kieser Graft quality verification in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how, when and why? , 2017, Current opinion in cardiology.

[6]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Graft flow assessment using a transit time flow meter in fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  T. Gerds,et al.  Transit‐Time Flow Measurement as a Predictor of Coronary Bypass Graft Failure at One Year Angiographic Follow‐Up , 2015, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  M. Penco,et al.  Intraoperative graft verification in coronary surgery: increased diagnostic accuracy adding high-resolution epicardial ultrasonography to transit-time flow measurement. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  H. Liberman,et al.  The Accuracy of Transit Time Flow Measurement in Predicting Graft Patency after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2013, Innovations.

[11]  J. Jokinen,et al.  Clinical value of intra-operative transit-time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective angiography-controlled study. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  M. Huebner,et al.  The impact of competitive flow on distal coronary flow and on graft flow during coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2011, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[13]  R. Rabozzi,et al.  Can transit-time flow measurement improve graft patency and clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting? , 2010, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[14]  I. Belenkie,et al.  Transit-time flow predicts outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft patients: a series of 1000 consecutive arterial grafts. , 2010, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Intraoperative coronary graft assessment , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.

[16]  J. Légaré,et al.  Intraoperative graft flow measurements during coronary artery bypass surgery predict in-hospital outcomes. , 2008, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  A. Usui,et al.  Predicting early coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  N. Becit,et al.  The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  O. Penn,et al.  Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  Gideon Cohen,et al.  A randomized comparison of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography and transit-time flow measurement to detect technical errors in coronary bypass grafts. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  M. di Mauro,et al.  Predictive value of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement for short-term graft patency in coronary surgery. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  D. Taggart,et al.  A comparison of transit-time flowmetry and intraoperative fluorescence imaging for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  A. Fraser,et al.  Epicardial Colour-Doppler Scanning of Coronary Artery Stenoses and Graft Anastomoses , 2002, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[25]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[26]  S. Koenig,et al.  Can visual assessment of flow waveform morphology detect anastomotic error in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[27]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[28]  A. Usui,et al.  Predicting midterm coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  A. Penttilä,et al.  Post-mortem cast angiography in the diagnostics of graft complications in patients with fatal outcome following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) , 1999, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[30]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  Flow measurement in coronary surgery. , 1999, The heart surgery forum.