The Strong Situation Hypothesis

A conventional wisdom in personality and social psychology and organizational behavior is that personality matters most in weak situations and least in strong situations. The authors trace the origins of this claim and examine the evidence for the personality-dampening effect of strong situations. The authors identify the gap between claim and evidence and suggest an agenda for future research.

[1]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[2]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice , 2004 .

[3]  Walter Mischel,et al.  Toward an integrative science of the person. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[5]  Y Shoda,et al.  The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  S. Hewa Medical technology: A pandora's box? , 1994, The Journal of medical humanities.

[7]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[8]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Individual differences and behavior in organizations , 1996 .

[9]  R. Tett,et al.  A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[11]  A. Caspi,et al.  When Do Individual Differences Matter? A Paradoxical Theory of Personality Coherence , 1993 .

[12]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research , 1989 .

[13]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[14]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[15]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Situation Strength on the Relationship between Personality and Provision of Effort , 2005 .

[16]  K S Bowers,et al.  Situationism in psychology: an analysis and a critique. , 1973, Psychological review.

[17]  W. Fleeson Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. , 2007, Journal of personality.

[18]  Seymour Adler,et al.  Personality and organizational behavior. , 1984 .

[19]  S. Milgram,et al.  Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. , 1966 .

[20]  W. Mischel Personality and Assessment , 1996 .

[21]  G. S. Saffold Culture Traits, Strength, and Organizational Performance: Moving Beyond “Strong” Culture , 1988 .

[22]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Cages in Tandem: Management Control, Social Identity, and Identification in a Knowledge-Intensive Firm , 2004 .

[23]  Heather McCreath,et al.  Person-environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. , 1990 .

[24]  M. Born,et al.  Personal and Situational Determinants of Personality Responses: A Partial Reanalysis and Reinterpretation of the Schmit et al. (1995) Data , 2001 .

[25]  Cheryl L. Adkins,et al.  Situational constraints on the achievement – performance relationship: a service sector study , 2001 .

[26]  W W Rankin,et al.  Fear and courage. , 1988, Journal of pediatric nursing.

[27]  Steven Mcshane,et al.  Canadian organizational behaviour , 2003 .

[28]  J. George,et al.  When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Nancy Cantor,et al.  A prototype analysis of psychological situations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[31]  Ebbe B. Ebbesen,et al.  Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants. , 1973 .

[32]  W. Fleeson Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distribution of states. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  W. Mischel,et al.  Links Between Personality Judgments and Contextualized Behavior Patterns: Situation-Behavior Profiles of Personality Prototypes , 1993 .

[34]  D. Funder,et al.  Behavior as a function of the situation. , 1983 .

[35]  T. C. Monson,et al.  Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single-act criteria. , 1982 .

[36]  G. Breeuwsma Geruchten als besmettelijke ziekte. Het succesverhaal van de Hush Puppies. Bespreking van Malcolm Gladwell, The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company, 2000 , 2000 .

[37]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[38]  Bruce Kirkcaldy,et al.  Personality predictors of driving accidents , 1997 .

[39]  E. Sadalla,et al.  The Search for Predictable Settings. Situational Prototypes, Constraint, and Behavioral Variation , 1985 .

[40]  C. N. Alexander,,et al.  Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. , 1971 .

[41]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior , 1996 .

[42]  D. Parmelee,et al.  Children of Cambodia's Killing Fields: Memoirs by Survivors , 1998 .

[43]  Hannah Arendt,et al.  Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil , 1964 .

[44]  H. E. King The Achievement Motive , 1977 .

[45]  W. Mischel,et al.  Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology , 2000 .

[46]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Conscientiousness and Task Performance: Test of Cognitive Process Model , 1996 .

[47]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Linking employee behaviour to external customer satisfaction using quality function deployment , 2004 .

[48]  W. Mischel,et al.  Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  W. Mischel,et al.  Intuitive interactionism in person perception: effects of situation--behavior relations on dispositional judgments. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  The Relation Between Personality and Contextual Performance in "Strong" Versus "Weak" Situations , 2001 .

[51]  D. Paulhus Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[52]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area , 1992 .

[53]  James R. Barker,et al.  The Discipline of Teamwork: Participation and Concertive Control , 1999 .

[54]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1989 .

[55]  Jesper B. Sørensen The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance , 2002 .

[56]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[57]  Margaret A. Marshall,et al.  Trait Aggressiveness and Situational Provocation: A Test of the Traits as Situational Sensitivities (TASS) Model , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[58]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers , 2001 .

[59]  Kathleen L. McGinn,et al.  Constraints and Triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in Negotiation , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[62]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[63]  J. Burger Obedience to Authority , 2011 .

[64]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[65]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[66]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[67]  Andrew J. Hall,et al.  The Lucifer Effect , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[68]  Richard H. Price,et al.  Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. , 1974 .