A Continuous User Authentication System Based on Galvanic Coupling Communication for s-Health

Smart health (s-health) is a vital topic and an essential research field today, supporting the real-time monitoring of user’s data by using sensors, either in direct or indirect contact with the human body. Real-time monitoring promotes changes in healthcare from a reactive to a proactive paradigm, contributing to early detection, prevention, and long-term management of health conditions. Under these new conditions, continuous user authentication plays a key role in protecting data and access control, once it focuses on keeping track of a user’s identity throughout the system operation. Traditional user authentication systems cannot fulfill the security requirements of s-health, because they are limited, prone to security breaches, and require the user to frequently authenticate by, e.g., a password or fingerprint. This interrupts the normal use of the system, being highly inconvenient and not user friendly. Also, data transmission in current authentication systems relies on wireless technologies, which are susceptible to eavesdropping during the pairing stage. Biological signals, e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG), can offer continuous and seamless authentication bolstered by exclusive characteristics from each individual. However, it is necessary to redesign current authentication systems to encompass biometric traits and new communication technologies that can jointly protect data and provide continuous authentication. Hence, this article presents a novel biosignal authentication system, in which the photoplethysmogram (PPG) biosignal and a galvanic coupling (GC) channel lead to continuous, seamless, and secure user authentication. Furthermore, this article contributes to a clear organization of the state of the art on biosignal-based continuous user authentication systems, assisting research studies in this field. The evaluation of the system feasibility presents accuracy in keeping data integrity and up to 98.66% accuracy in the authentication process.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[2]  Yuan-Ting Zhang,et al.  A novel biometric approach in human verification by photoplethysmographic signals , 2003, 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2003..

[3]  Qing Yang,et al.  HMOG: New Behavioral Biometric Features for Continuous Authentication of Smartphone Users , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[4]  Archan Misra,et al.  BreathPrint: Breathing Acoustics-based User Authentication , 2017, MobiSys.

[5]  Chunhua Su,et al.  You Think, Therefore You Are: Transparent Authentication System with Brainwave-Oriented Bio-Features for IoT Networks , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[6]  Susmita Sur-Kolay,et al.  CABA: Continuous Authentication Based on BioAura , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[7]  Daniel Celebucki,et al.  A security evaluation of popular Internet of Things protocols for manufacturers , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[8]  Bruno Crispo,et al.  Demystifying Authentication Concepts in Smartphones: Ways and Types to Secure Access , 2018, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Paul Haskell-Dowland,et al.  Smart watch based body-temperature authentication , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics (ICCNI).

[10]  Petros Spachos,et al.  Feasibility study of photoplethysmographic signals for biometric identification , 2011, 2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[11]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Evaluation of Electrocardiogram for Biometric Authentication , 2012, J. Information Security.

[12]  Amr Mohamed,et al.  Edge Computing for Smart Health: Context-Aware Approaches, Opportunities, and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Network.

[13]  Pedro Peris-Lopez,et al.  On the Feasibility of Low-Cost Wearable Sensors for Multi-Modal Biometric Verification , 2018, Sensors.

[14]  Fethi Bereksi-Reguig,et al.  A novel biometric authentication approach using ECG and EMG signals , 2015, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[15]  Thaier Hayajneh,et al.  Security Vulnerabilities in Bluetooth Technology as Used in IoT , 2018, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[16]  Hisaaki Yamaba,et al.  Evaluation of feature values of surface electromyograms for user authentication on mobile devices , 2016, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[17]  Álvaro Alesanco Iglesias,et al.  Biometric Authentication Using the PPG: A Long-Term Feasibility Study , 2018, Sensors.

[18]  Shuangquan Wang,et al.  Continuous Authentication With Touch Behavioral Biometrics and Voice on Wearable Glasses , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[19]  Myoungho Lee,et al.  Adaptive threshold method for the peak detection of photoplethysmographic waveform , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[20]  Jian Wang,et al.  A Continuous Identity Authentication Scheme Based on Physiological and Behavioral Characteristics , 2018, Sensors.

[21]  Jian Liu,et al.  Your Heart Won't Lie: PPG-based Continuous Authentication on Wrist-worn Wearable Devices , 2018, MobiCom.

[22]  Lu Zhou,et al.  I Walk, Therefore I Am: Continuous User Authentication with Plantar Biometrics , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  Michele Nogueira Lima,et al.  Secure On-skin Biometric Signal Transmission using Galvanic Coupling , 2019, IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[24]  P. Samarati,et al.  Access control: principle and practice , 1994, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  Wenyao Xu,et al.  Cardiac Scan: A Non-contact and Continuous Heart-based User Authentication System , 2017, MobiCom.