Efficacy of computerized discrimination between structure-related and non-structure-related echoes in ultrasonographic images for the quantitative evaluation of the structural integrity of superficial digital flexor tendons in horses.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate effectiveness of computerized discrimination between structure-related and non-structure-related echoes in ultrasonographic images for quantitative evaluation of tendon structural integrity in horses. SAMPLE POPULATION 4 superficial digital flexor tendons (2 damaged tendons, 2 normal tendons). PROCEDURE Transverse ultrasonographic images that precisely matched histologic sections were obtained in fixed steps along the long axis of each tendon. Distribution, intensity, and delineation of structure-related echoes, quantitatively expressed as the correlation ratio and steadiness ratio , were compared with histologic findings in tissue that was normal or had necrosis, early granulation, late granulation, early fibrosis, or inferior repair. RESULTS In normal tendon, the even distribution of structure-related echoes with high intensity and sharp delineation yielded high correlation ratio and steadiness ratio. In areas of necrosis, collapsed endotendon septa yielded solid but blurred structure-related echoes (high correlation ration and low steadiness ratio). In early granulation tissue, complete lack of organization caused zero values for both ratios. In late granulation tissue, reorganization and swollen endotendon septa yielded poorly delineated structure-related echoes (high correlation ratio, low steadiness ratio). In early fibrosis, rearrangement of bundles resulted in normal correlation ration and slightly low steadiness ratio. In inferior repair, the almost complete lack of structural reorganization resulted in heterogeneous poorly delineated low-intensity echoes (low correlation ratio and steadiness ratio). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The combination of correlation ratio and steadiness ratio accurately reflects histopathologic findings, making computerized correlation of ultrasonographic images an efficient tool for quantitative evaluation of tendon structural integrity.

[1]  R. Henninger.  Treatment of superficial digital flexor tendinitis. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[2]  B. Strömberg.  The normal and diseased superficial flexor tendon in race horses. A morphologic and physiologic investigation. , 1971, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[3]  A. Goodship,et al.  The pathobiology and repair of tendon and ligament injury. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[4]  J. Render,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE, ULTRASOUND AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION OF ACUTE AND HEALING EQUINE TENDON INJURIES , 1992 .

[5]  A. Barneveld,et al.  Ultrasonographic evaluation and long term follow-up of flexor tendonitis/desmitis in the metacarpal/metatarsal region in Dutch warmblood horses and standardbred racehorses. , 1994, The Veterinary quarterly.

[6]  S. Dyson,et al.  Suspensory ligament desmitis. , 1995, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[7]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of equine tendons: a quantitative in vitro study of the effects of amplifier gain level, transducer-tilt, and transducer-displacement. , 1999, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[8]  P. Manske,et al.  Collagen synthesis during primate flexor tendon repair in vitro , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  C. Marr,et al.  Ultrasonographic and histopathological findings in equine superficial digital flexor tendon injury. , 1993, Equine veterinary journal.

[10]  S. Dyson,et al.  Practical management of superficial digital flexor tendinitis in the performance horse. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[11]  L. Józsa,et al.  Alterations in dry mass content of collagen fibers in degenerative tendinopathy and tendon-rupture. , 1989, Matrix.

[12]  M Halliwell,et al.  Ultimate limits in ultrasonic imaging resolution. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  N. Rantanen,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasonography of equine limbs. , 1986, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[14]  L E Lanyon,et al.  A clinical and experimental study of tendon injury, healing and treatment in the horse. , 1983, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[15]  C. Enwemeka.  Inflammation, cellularity, and fibrillogenesis in regenerating tendon: implications for tendon rehabilitation. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[16]  H C Schamhardt,et al.  In vitro mechanical properties of equine tendons in relation to cross-sectional area and collagen content. , 1985, Research in veterinary science.

[17]  A. Goodship,et al.  Tendon injuries and their treatment in the horse , 1979, Veterinary Record.

[18]  H. Yamada,et al.  EVALUATION OF SUPERFICIAL DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDINITIS IN RACING HORSES THROUGH GRAY SCALE HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS OF TENDON ULTRASONOGRAMS , 1996 .

[19]  P D Rossdale,et al.  Epidemiological study of wastage among racehorses 1982 and 1983 , 1985, Veterinary Record.

[20]  D. J. Riemersma,et al.  Variations in cross-sectional area and composition of equine tendons with regard to their mechanical function. , 1986, Research in veterinary science.

[21]  E. M. Bakker,et al.  Structure-related echoes in ultrasonographic images of equine superficial digital flexor tendons. , 2000, American journal of veterinary research.

[22]  T. Stashak,et al.  A comparison of repair methods for gap healing in equine flexor tendon. , 1990, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[23]  A K Wood,et al.  Ultrasonographical and pathological studies of equine superficial digital flexor tendons; initial observations, including tissue characterisation by analysis of image grey scale, in a thoroughbred gelding. , 1992, Equine veterinary journal.

[24]  N. Crevier-Denoix,et al.  Mechanical properties of pathological equine superficial digital flexor tendons. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[25]  B S Simpson,et al.  Clinical experience with quantitative analysis of superficial digital flexor tendon injuries in Thoroughbred and Standardbred racehorses. , 1990, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[26]  Harris Ra,et al.  Ultimate limits in ultrasound image resolution. , 1993 .

[27]  B. Strömberg,et al.  13 Lesions of the Superficial Flexor Tendon in Race Horses: A Microangiographic and Histopathologic Study , 1969, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  S. Weisbrode,et al.  Effects of Tendon Splitting on Experimentally-Induced Acute Equine Tendinitis , 1992, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[29]  P. R. Weeren,et al.  Ultrasonographic tissue characterization of equine superficial digital flexor tendons by means of gray level statistics. , 2000, American journal of veterinary research.

[30]  P. Webbon.  Equine tendon stress injuries. , 1973, Equine veterinary journal.

[31]  A. Goodship,et al.  Studies on the pathogenesis of equine tendonitis following collagenase injury. , 1984, Research in veterinary science.

[32]  A. Goodship,et al.  The pathophysiology of the flexor tendons in the equine athlete , 1996 .

[33]  M. Steiner.  Biomechanics of tendon healing. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Q. Mckellar,et al.  Factors affecting the clinical outcome of injuries to the superficial digital flexor tendon in National Hunt and point-to-point racehorses , 1993, Veterinary Record.

[35]  J. R. Pearson,et al.  Wound healing of tendon--II. A mathematical model. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  I. F. Williams,et al.  Cell morphology and collagen types in equine tendon scar. , 1980, Research in veterinary science.