Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel

Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were –0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.

[1]  Effects of phantom volume and shape on the accuracy of MRI BANG gel dosimetry using BANG3. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Jatinder R Palta,et al.  Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  L Kumaraswamy,et al.  Using an EPID for patient-specific VMAT quality assurance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  P. Lambin,et al.  A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  S. Korreman,et al.  RapidArc treatment verification in 3D using polymer gel dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  3D Dosimetric verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy by portal dosimetry. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Yoichi Watanabe,et al.  Errors introduced by dose scaling for relative dosimetry , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  Geoffrey S Ibbott,et al.  American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) , 2012, American journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  Lei Dong,et al.  Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  Stine Korreman,et al.  Dosimetric verification of RapidArc treatment delivery , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[11]  Y. Hirokawa,et al.  Evaluation of the basic properties of the BANGkit™ gel dosimeter , 2007, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[12]  M. Oldham,et al.  Polymer gel dosimetry. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Z Li,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of a novel polymer gel dosimeter for proton therapy. , 2010, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[15]  H. Kubo,et al.  A variable echo-number method for estimating R2 in MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.