Testing probabilistic models of choice using column generation

In so-called random preference models of probabilistic choice, a decision maker chooses according to an unspecified probability distribution over preference states. The most prominent case arises when preference states are linear orders or weak orders of the choice alternatives. The literature has documented that actually evaluating whether decision makers' observed choices are consistent with such a probabilistic model of choice poses computational difficulties. This severely limits the possible scale of empirical work in behavioral economics and related disciplines. We propose a family of column generation based algorithms for performing such tests. We evaluate our algorithms on various sets of instances. We observe substantial improvements in computation time and conclude that we can efficiently test substantially larger data sets than previously possible.

[1]  J. Farkas Theorie der einfachen Ungleichungen. , 1902 .

[2]  L. Lovász,et al.  Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization , 1981 .

[3]  Rosa L. Matzkin HETEROGENEOUS CHOICE , 2006 .

[4]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: comment on Loomes (2010). , 2014, Psychological review.

[5]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Linear Programming and Network Flows , 1977 .

[6]  Daniel R. Cavagnaro,et al.  Transitive in Our Preferences, But Transitive in Different Ways: An Analysis of Choice Variability , 2014 .

[7]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  Heterogeneity and Parsimony in Intertemporal Choice , 2017 .

[8]  Irène Charon,et al.  A survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments , 2007, 4OR.

[9]  Clintin P Davis-Stober,et al.  QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice. , 2014, Decisions.

[10]  Rafael Martí,et al.  Intensification and diversification with elite tabu search solutions for the linear ordering problem , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Gerhard Reinelt,et al.  The Linear Ordering Problem: Exact and Heuristic Methods in Combinatorial Optimization , 2011 .

[12]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  Selected Topics in Column Generation , 2002, Oper. Res..

[13]  Samuel Fiorini,et al.  Facets of the linear ordering polytope: A unification for the fence family through weighted graphs , 2006 .

[14]  C. Davis-Stober,et al.  Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences. , 2012, Psychological review.

[15]  Jörg Stoye,et al.  Revealed Preferences in a Heterogeneous Population , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[17]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[18]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  Commentary: “Neural signatures of intransitive preferences” , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  Testing Transitivity of Preferences on Two-Alternative Forced Choice Data , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[20]  Daniel E. L. Promislow,et al.  Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  Samuel Fiorini,et al.  0, 1/2-Cuts and the Linear Ordering Problem: Surfaces That Define Facets , 2006, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[22]  J. Dana,et al.  Transitivity of preferences. , 2011, Psychological review.

[23]  R. Gomory,et al.  A Linear Programming Approach to the Cutting-Stock Problem , 1961 .

[24]  H. D. Block,et al.  Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960) , 1959 .

[25]  T. Dridi Sur les distributions binaires associées à des distributions ordinales , 1980 .

[26]  Clintin P. Davis-Stober,et al.  A lexicographic semiorder polytope and probabilistic representations of choice , 2012 .

[27]  Nimrod Megiddo Mixtures of order matrices and generalized order matrices , 1977, Discret. Math..

[28]  Y. Kitamura,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models: Testing , 2013 .

[29]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  The Construct–Behavior Gap in Behavioral Decision Research: A Challenge Beyond Replicability , 2017, Psychological review.

[30]  Bart Smeulders Testing a mixture model of single-peaked preferences , 2018, Math. Soc. Sci..

[31]  Irene Klugkist,et al.  The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..