Slip model of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS‐2 and GPS data

We use surface deformation measurements including Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data acquired by the ALOS-2 mission of the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency and Global Positioning System (GPS) data to invert for the fault geometry and coseismic slip distribution of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. Assuming that the ruptured fault connects to the surface trace of the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) fault between 84.34°E and 86.19°E, the best fitting model suggests a dip angle of 7°. The moment calculated from the slip model is 6.08 × 1020 Nm, corresponding to the moment magnitude of 7.79. The rupture of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake was dominated by thrust motion that was primarily concentrated in a 150 km long zone 50 to 100 km northward from the surface trace of the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT), with maximum slip of ∼ 5.8 m at a depth of ∼8 km. Data thus indicate that the 2015 Gorkha earthquake ruptured a deep part of the seismogenic zone, in contrast to the 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake, which had ruptured a shallow part of the adjacent fault segment to the east.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Mountain Building, Erosion, and the Seismic Cycle in the Nepal Himalaya , 2003 .

[2]  P. Molnar,et al.  Earthquakes. Himalayan seismic hazard. , 2001, Science.

[3]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Seismotectonics of the Nepal Himalaya from a local seismic network , 1999 .

[4]  P. Molnar,et al.  Seismic moments of major earthquakes and the average rate of slip in central Asia , 1977 .

[5]  Lin Ding,et al.  Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: Implications for seismic hazard , 2011 .

[6]  Jérôme Lavé,et al.  Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal) , 1995 .

[7]  L. Bollinger,et al.  Primary surface ruptures of the great Himalayan earthquakes in 1934 and 1255 , 2012, Nature Geoscience.

[8]  L. Rivera,et al.  Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations , 2002 .

[9]  Y. Fialko.  Probing the mechanical properties of seismically active crust with space geodesy: Study of the coseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers (southern California) earthquake , 2004 .

[10]  Y. Okada.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[11]  John Chen,et al.  Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet Collision Zone Revealed by the Hi-CLIMB Experiment , 2009, Science.

[12]  Peter Molnar,et al.  Himalayan Seismic Hazard , 2001, Science.

[13]  J. Galetzka,et al.  Slip pulse and resonance of the Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal , 2015, Science.

[14]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  Line‐of‐sight displacement from ALOS‐2 interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock , 2015 .

[15]  U.,et al.  Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu , 2015 .

[16]  Rowena B. Lohman,et al.  Some thoughts on the use of InSAR data to constrain models of surface deformation: Noise structure and data downsampling , 2005 .

[17]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[18]  Yuri Fialko,et al.  Space geodetic observations and models of postseismic deformation due to the 2005 M7.6 Kashmir (Pakistan) earthquake , 2014 .

[19]  Jérôme Lavé,et al.  Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal , 2000 .