Morphology and density of mussels on natural and aquaculture structure habitats: implications for sea duck predators

We compared density and morphology of wild mussels Mytilus trossulus growing natu- rally on shellfish farming structures to that of mussels from nearby intertidal areas, and considered the relevance to molluscivorous sea ducks. Mussel density on aquaculture structures greatly exceeded that of intertidal areas and farm mussels were larger, had lower shell mass, and had weaker byssal attachments. Differences in environmental conditions and predation regimes through- out the summer growing season were likely responsible for these differences. These morphological and density differences, in turn, have important implications for their primary winter predators, sea ducks, including surf scoters Melanitta perspicillata and Barrow's goldeneyes Bucephala islandica. Higher levels of mussel depletion in farm habitats and strong associations of ducks with shellfish farms indicate that sea ducks responded to this novel, profitable prey resource. Our results support recent research that indicates that artificial structures introduced into coastal areas create novel marine habitats that can support unique communities of epibiota. That sea ducks appear to profit from the introduction of aquaculture structures is evidence of a positive effect of anthropogenic modifications in a coastal environment.

[1]  D. Esler,et al.  Effects of predation by sea ducks on clam abundance in soft-bottom intertidal habitats , 2007 .

[2]  D. Esler,et al.  Habitat Use by Wintering Surf and White-Winged Scoters: Effects of Environmental Attributes and Shellfish Aquaculture , 2006 .

[3]  A. Underwood,et al.  An experimental assessment of the potential impacts of longline mussel farming on the infauna in an open coastal embayment , 2006 .

[4]  J. Lovvorn,et al.  Effects of clam species dominance on nutrient and energy acquisition by spectacled eiders in the Bering Sea , 2003 .

[5]  R. Caldow,et al.  How to toughen up your mussels: using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses , 2003 .

[6]  M. Rule,et al.  Artificial substrata in a shallow sublittoral habitat: do they adequately represent natural habitats or the local species pool? , 2002 .

[7]  S. Connell,et al.  Why do floating structures create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota , 2002 .

[8]  O. Reimer,et al.  Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea , 2001 .

[9]  E. Bourget,et al.  Shell allometry and length-mass-density relationship for Mytilus edulis in an experimental food-regulated situation , 2001 .

[10]  S. Connell,et al.  Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs. , 2001, Marine environmental research.

[11]  Jeanie Stenton-Dozey,et al.  Impact of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) raft-culture on benthic macrofauna, in situ oxygen uptake, and nutrient fluxes in Saldanha Bay, South Africa , 2001 .

[12]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Orientation and position of substrata have large effects on epibiotic assemblages , 2001 .

[13]  R. Scheibling,et al.  Predicting wave dislodgment of mussels: variation in attachment strength with body size,habitat, and season , 2001 .

[14]  M. Guillemette,et al.  Influence of annual variation in food supply on abundance of wintering common eiders Somateria mollissima , 2000 .

[15]  Robert J. Akester,et al.  Shell shape, dysodont tooth morphology, and hinge-ligament thickness in the bay mussel Mytilus trossulus correlate with wave exposure , 2000 .

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[18]  Thomas D. Nudds,et al.  SIZE-SELECTIVE PREDATION OF BLUE MUSSELS (MYTILUS EDULIS) BY COMMON EIDERS (SOMATERIA MOLLISSIMA) UNDER CONTROLLED FIELD CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[19]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Urban structures as marine habitats , 1999 .

[20]  George H. Leonard,et al.  CRAB PREDATION, WATERBORNE CUES, AND INDUCIBLE DEFENSES IN THE BLUE MUSSEL, MYTILUS EDULIS , 1999 .

[21]  J. D. Leeuw FOOD INTAKE RATES AND HABITAT SEGREGATION OF TUFTED DUCK AYTHYA FULIGULA AND SCAUP AYTHYA MARILA EXPLOITING ZEBRA MUSSELS DREISSENA POLYMORPHA , 1999 .

[22]  J. Geller,et al.  Zoogeographic Distributions of the Sibling Species Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. trossulus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) and Their Hybrids in the North Pacific. , 1997, The Biological bulletin.

[23]  O. Reimer,et al.  Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens , 1996 .

[24]  M. Guillemette,et al.  Availability and consumption of food by common eiders wintering in the Gulf of St. Lawrence: evidence of prey depletion , 1996 .

[25]  J. Norberg,et al.  Attack behaviour and predatory success of Asterias rubens L. related to differences in size and morphology of the prey mussel Mytilus edulis L , 1995 .

[26]  C. Robles,et al.  Responses of a Key Intertidal Predator to Varying Recruitment of Its Prey , 1995 .

[27]  J. Fuentes,et al.  Settlement of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis on collectors suspended from rafts in the Ría de Arousa (NW of Spain): annual pattern and spatial variability , 1994 .

[28]  E. Berlow,et al.  The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1994 .

[29]  Andrew D. West,et al.  The availability and quality of the mussel prey (Mytilus edulis) of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) , 1993 .

[30]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Population and community ecol-ogy of Mytilus , 1992 .

[31]  R. K. Koehn,et al.  Allozymes and morphometric characters of three species ofMytilus in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres , 1991 .

[32]  K. Erikstad,et al.  Size selection of common mussels, Mytilus edulis, by common eiders, Somateria mollissima: energy maximization or shell weight minimization? , 1990 .

[33]  R. Grosberg Intertidal Zonation of Barnacles: The Influence of Planktonic Zonation of Larvae on Vertical Distribution of Adults , 1982 .

[34]  J. Harger THE EFFECT OF WAVE IMPACT ON SOME ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF SEA MUSSELS , 1970 .

[35]  R. Seed Factors Influencing Shell Shape in the Mussel Mytilus Edulis , 1968, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.