Morphology and density of mussels on natural and aquaculture structure habitats: implications for sea duck predators
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Esler | W. S. Boyd | M. Kirk | W. Boyd
[1] D. Esler,et al. Effects of predation by sea ducks on clam abundance in soft-bottom intertidal habitats , 2007 .
[2] D. Esler,et al. Habitat Use by Wintering Surf and White-Winged Scoters: Effects of Environmental Attributes and Shellfish Aquaculture , 2006 .
[3] A. Underwood,et al. An experimental assessment of the potential impacts of longline mussel farming on the infauna in an open coastal embayment , 2006 .
[4] J. Lovvorn,et al. Effects of clam species dominance on nutrient and energy acquisition by spectacled eiders in the Bering Sea , 2003 .
[5] R. Caldow,et al. How to toughen up your mussels: using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses , 2003 .
[6] M. Rule,et al. Artificial substrata in a shallow sublittoral habitat: do they adequately represent natural habitats or the local species pool? , 2002 .
[7] S. Connell,et al. Why do floating structures create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota , 2002 .
[8] O. Reimer,et al. Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea , 2001 .
[9] E. Bourget,et al. Shell allometry and length-mass-density relationship for Mytilus edulis in an experimental food-regulated situation , 2001 .
[10] S. Connell,et al. Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs. , 2001, Marine environmental research.
[11] Jeanie Stenton-Dozey,et al. Impact of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) raft-culture on benthic macrofauna, in situ oxygen uptake, and nutrient fluxes in Saldanha Bay, South Africa , 2001 .
[12] Tim M. Glasby,et al. Orientation and position of substrata have large effects on epibiotic assemblages , 2001 .
[13] R. Scheibling,et al. Predicting wave dislodgment of mussels: variation in attachment strength with body size,habitat, and season , 2001 .
[14] M. Guillemette,et al. Influence of annual variation in food supply on abundance of wintering common eiders Somateria mollissima , 2000 .
[15] Robert J. Akester,et al. Shell shape, dysodont tooth morphology, and hinge-ligament thickness in the bay mussel Mytilus trossulus correlate with wave exposure , 2000 .
[16] David R. Anderson,et al. Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .
[17] David R. Anderson,et al. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .
[18] Thomas D. Nudds,et al. SIZE-SELECTIVE PREDATION OF BLUE MUSSELS (MYTILUS EDULIS) BY COMMON EIDERS (SOMATERIA MOLLISSIMA) UNDER CONTROLLED FIELD CONDITIONS , 1999 .
[19] Tim M. Glasby,et al. Urban structures as marine habitats , 1999 .
[20] George H. Leonard,et al. CRAB PREDATION, WATERBORNE CUES, AND INDUCIBLE DEFENSES IN THE BLUE MUSSEL, MYTILUS EDULIS , 1999 .
[21] J. D. Leeuw. FOOD INTAKE RATES AND HABITAT SEGREGATION OF TUFTED DUCK AYTHYA FULIGULA AND SCAUP AYTHYA MARILA EXPLOITING ZEBRA MUSSELS DREISSENA POLYMORPHA , 1999 .
[22] J. Geller,et al. Zoogeographic Distributions of the Sibling Species Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. trossulus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) and Their Hybrids in the North Pacific. , 1997, The Biological bulletin.
[23] O. Reimer,et al. Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens , 1996 .
[24] M. Guillemette,et al. Availability and consumption of food by common eiders wintering in the Gulf of St. Lawrence: evidence of prey depletion , 1996 .
[25] J. Norberg,et al. Attack behaviour and predatory success of Asterias rubens L. related to differences in size and morphology of the prey mussel Mytilus edulis L , 1995 .
[26] C. Robles,et al. Responses of a Key Intertidal Predator to Varying Recruitment of Its Prey , 1995 .
[27] J. Fuentes,et al. Settlement of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis on collectors suspended from rafts in the Ría de Arousa (NW of Spain): annual pattern and spatial variability , 1994 .
[28] E. Berlow,et al. The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1994 .
[29] Andrew D. West,et al. The availability and quality of the mussel prey (Mytilus edulis) of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) , 1993 .
[30] Raymond B. Seed,et al. Population and community ecol-ogy of Mytilus , 1992 .
[31] R. K. Koehn,et al. Allozymes and morphometric characters of three species ofMytilus in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres , 1991 .
[32] K. Erikstad,et al. Size selection of common mussels, Mytilus edulis, by common eiders, Somateria mollissima: energy maximization or shell weight minimization? , 1990 .
[33] R. Grosberg. Intertidal Zonation of Barnacles: The Influence of Planktonic Zonation of Larvae on Vertical Distribution of Adults , 1982 .
[34] J. Harger. THE EFFECT OF WAVE IMPACT ON SOME ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF SEA MUSSELS , 1970 .
[35] R. Seed. Factors Influencing Shell Shape in the Mussel Mytilus Edulis , 1968, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.