Diffuse domain method for needle insertion simulations

We present a new strategy for needle insertion simulations without the necessity of meshing. A diffuse domain approach on a regular grid is applied to overcome the need for an explicit representation of organ boundaries. A phase field function captures the transition of tissue parameters and boundary conditions are imposed implicitly. Uncertainties of a volume segmentation are translated in the width of the phase field, an approach that is novel and overcomes the problem of defining an accurate segmentation boundary. We perform a convergence analysis of the diffuse elastic equation for decreasing phase field width, compare our results to deformation fields received from conforming mesh simulations and analyze the diffuse linear elastic equation for different idths of material interfaces. Then, the approach is applied to computed tomography data of a patient with liver tumors. A three-class U-Net is used to automatically generate tissue probability maps serving as phase field functions for the transition of elastic parameters between different tissues. The needle tissue interaction forces are approximated by the absolute gradient of a phase field function, which eliminates the need for explicit boundary parameterization and collision detection at the needle-tissue interface. The results show that the deformation field of the diffuse domain approach is comparable to the deformation of a conforming mesh simulation. Uncertainties of tissue boundaries are included in the model and the simulation can be directly performed on the automatically generated voxel-based probability maps. Thus, it is possible to perform easily implementable patient-specific elastomechanical simulations directly on voxel data. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Stéphane P. A. Bordas,et al.  Corotational Cut Finite Element Method for real-time surgical simulation: application to needle insertion simulation , 2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[2]  G. Mase,et al.  Continuum Mechanics for Engineers, Second Edition , 1999 .

[3]  Xiangrong Li,et al.  SOLVING PDES IN COMPLEX GEOMETRIES: A DIFFUSE DOMAIN APPROACH. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.

[4]  Stein K. F. Stoter,et al.  The diffuse Nitsche method: Dirichlet constraints on phase‐field boundaries , 2018 .

[5]  Guillermo Lorenzo,et al.  Tissue-scale, personalized modeling and simulation of prostate cancer growth , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  Dilated Residual Networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  Stein K. F. Stoter,et al.  Phase‐field boundary conditions for the voxel finite cell method: Surface‐free stress analysis of CT‐based bone structures , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[8]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Computational approach for modeling intra- and extracellular dynamics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[10]  Christian Miehe,et al.  A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits , 2010 .

[11]  Y. Kobayashi,et al.  In vitro validation of viscoelastic and nonlinear physical model of liver for needle insertion simulation , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[12]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture , 2012 .

[13]  David Wells,et al.  The deal.II library, Version 9.1 , 2019, J. Num. Math..

[14]  C. M. Elliott,et al.  Numerical computation of advection and diffusion on evolving diffuse interfaces , 2011 .

[15]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Modeling and simulation of flexible needles. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Axel Voigt,et al.  A DIFFUSE-INTERFACE APPROACH FOR MODELING TRANSPORT, DIFFUSION AND ADSORPTION/DESORPTION OF MATERIAL QUANTITIES ON A DEFORMABLE INTERFACE. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.

[17]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Liver fibrosis: non‐invasive assessment with MR elastography , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[20]  Matthias Schlottbom Error analysis of a diffuse interface method for elliptic problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions , 2015, 1507.08814.

[21]  Luc Soler,et al.  Experimental mechanical characterization of abdominal organs: liver, kidney & spleen. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[22]  Christopher Joseph Pal,et al.  The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2016, LABELS/DLMIA@MICCAI.

[23]  Peter Wust,et al.  Computed tomography-guided brachytherapy for liver cancer. , 2011, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[24]  Chi-Wing Fu,et al.  H-DenseUNet: Hybrid Densely Connected UNet for Liver and Tumor Segmentation From CT Volumes , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Yongmin Zhong,et al.  Deformable Models for Surgical Simulation: A Survey , 2019, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi,et al.  Automatic Liver and Lesion Segmentation in CT Using Cascaded Fully Convolutional Neural Networks and 3D Conditional Random Fields , 2016, MICCAI.

[27]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Haptic Simulator for Prostate Brachytherapy with Simulated Needle and Probe Interaction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.