Social psychological research and the Internet : the promise and peril of a new methodological frontier

The Internet has expanded people's ability to connect with others. People can connect to those with whom they have existing social ties, as well as make new connections with others who may share similar interests and ideologies. These connections can be achieved through a variety of means and with varying levels of social involvement, such as viewing or creating personal web pages, posting to online discussion forums, and communicating via e-mail or instant messaging. These unprecedented advances in communication and the proliferation of Internet-based technologies have led many social psychologists to take advantage of the power of the Internet in their research. In a similar vein, access to large numbers of potential research participants as well as increased access to special populations have lured many to explore the potential of collecting data to test social psychological hypotheses using web-based samples. The Internet allows for generalization beyond the college student subject pool, with the benefits of experimental manipulation, audio and visual presentation of stimuli, live and spontaneous interaction between participants, and higher degrees of complexity than is possible with other methods of data collection typically used outside of the traditional social psychological laboratory. There are many reasons to be excited about the methodological possibilities of using the Internet as a medium for social psychological research. The range of possibilities for conducting research is expanding at approximately the same rate as information technology is expanding. Just as there are increasingly more ways to obtain information and data in general, there is also a growing number of ways to obtain social psychological data. The goal of this chapter is to provide a review of how social psychologists are currently using the web and to present some specific examples of translational,

[1]  K. McGraw,et al.  The Integrity of Web-Delivered Experiments: Can You Trust the Data? , 2000, Psychological science.

[2]  P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[3]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[4]  David C. Evans,et al.  In the Privacy of Their Own Homes: Using the Internet to Assess Racial Bias , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[5]  K. McGraw,et al.  A common language effect size statistic. , 1992 .

[6]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[7]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Coming Out in the Age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization” Through Virtual Group Participation , 1998 .

[8]  Linda J. Skitka,et al.  Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning , 2002 .

[9]  Mick P. Couper A Comparison of Mail and E-Mail for a Survey of Employees in Federal Statistical Agencies , 2001 .

[10]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors , 1992 .

[11]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[12]  L. Newman,et al.  Understanding genocide : the social psychology of the Holocaust , 2002 .

[13]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[14]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Information Technologies , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[15]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[16]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[17]  Storm A. King,et al.  Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site , 2002 .

[19]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[20]  L. Skitka Ideological and Attributional Boundaries on Public Compassion: Reactions to Individuals and Communities Affected by a Natural Disaster , 1999 .

[21]  Cassandra L. Govan,et al.  Investigations into differences between social- and cyberostracism. , 2002 .

[22]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Virginia Gil-Rivas,et al.  Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[24]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Introduction to Behavioral Research on the Internet , 2000 .

[25]  P. Tetlock Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[26]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Context Effects on Survey Responses to Questions About Abortion , 1981 .

[27]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. , 2002 .

[28]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment , 1998 .

[29]  W. Keith Campbell,et al.  Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world , 2003 .

[30]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Virtual group dynamics. , 2002 .

[31]  J. I. Kim,et al.  Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  H. Kelman,et al.  Human use of human subjects: the problem of deception in social psychological experiments. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Fund-Raising on the Web: The Effect of an Electronic Foot-in-the-Door on Donation , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  M. Birnbaum Testing Critical Properties of Decision Making on the Internet , 1999 .

[35]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond Hearing : Where Real-World and Online Support Meet , 2002 .

[36]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[37]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  L. Skitka Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning , 2002 .

[39]  J. Musch,et al.  Online auctions as a research tool : A field experiment on ethnic discrimination , 2003 .

[40]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  The lost e-mail method: Milgram’s lost-letter technique in the age of the Internet , 1997 .

[41]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research , 2000 .

[42]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research , 1991 .

[43]  Robin M. Mathy,et al.  Methodological Rigor with Internet Samples: New Ways to Reach Underrepresented Populations , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[44]  M. Couper A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[45]  S. Gosling,et al.  An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners , 1998 .

[46]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[47]  T. Tyler Is the Internet Changing Social Life? It Seems the More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same , 2002 .

[48]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments , 1997 .

[49]  P. Tetlock Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[50]  C. Crandall Do Parents Discriminate Against their Heavyweight Daughters? , 1995 .

[51]  Steven Hitlin,et al.  Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. , 2003 .

[52]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Study of Social Desirability Distortion in Computer- Administered Questionnaires, Traditional Questionnaires, and Interviews , 1999 .

[53]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[54]  M H Birnbaum,et al.  SurveyWiz and factorWiz: Javascript Web pages that make HTML forms for research on the internet , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[55]  Jerry Finn,et al.  Computer-Based Self-Help Groups for Sexual Abuse Survivors , 1994 .

[56]  Deborah Ruth Richardson,et al.  Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: The important role of debriefing , 1983 .

[57]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  A Brief History of Web Experimenting , 2000 .

[58]  D. Green,et al.  Studying Hate Crime with the Internet: What Makes Racists Advocate Racial Violence? , 2002 .