Triple Helix Clusters: Boundary Permeability at University—Industry—Government Interfaces as a Regional Innovation Strategy

With this paper I discuss the importance of permeability among university—industry—government boundaries based on the experience of MIT and Boston, Stanford and Silicon Valley, the Research Triangle and North Carolina, and Newcastle University and Northeast UK. Encouraging permeability in university boundaries is a first step to creating an entrepreneurial university, the driving force of the most successful innovation regions. Underlying drivers of innovation are transferable and may be instituted by specif c policy initiatives addressing gaps in particular cases. These is no one-size-fits-all ‘best-practice’ mode but there are some common characteristics of innovation regimes such as ‘boundary permeability’ that can be positively influenced by explicit measures.

[1]  James C. Williams.  Frederick E. Terman and the rise of Silicon Valley , 1998 .

[2]  M. Kenney,et al.  Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1999 .

[3]  M. Luger.  Science and technology in regional economic development: The role of policy in Europe, Japan, and the United States , 1994 .

[4]  N. Dorfman,et al.  Route 128 : The Development of a Regional High Technology Economy : Research Policy , 1983 .

[5]  P. Cooke.  Global Bioregions: Knowledge Domains, Capabilities and Innovation System Networks , 2006 .

[6]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[7]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Venture Capital Revolution , 2001 .

[8]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Unity and Diversity in High-tech Growth and Renewal: Learning from Boston and Silicon Valley , 2008 .

[9]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium , 2003, Scientometrics.

[10]  Stephen B. Adams,et al.  Manufacturing the Future: A History of Western Electric , 1999 .

[11]  Kevin Davis,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Learning the Silicon Valley Way , 2004 .

[12]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[13]  Harald Bathelt,et al.  Regional competence and economic recovery: divergent growth paths in Boston's high technology economy , 2001 .

[14]  Claire Nauwelaers,et al.  Innovating SMEs and Regions: The Need for Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[15]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[16]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[17]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[18]  Margaret O'Mara.  Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley , 2005 .