Slope effect on laboratory fire spread: contribution of radiation and convection to fuel bed preheating

Two series of 16 and 18 laboratory fire experiments were conducted to explore the respective roles of radiation and convection heat transfer in slope effect on fire spread. The first series attempts to measure fuel temperature and gas temperature simultaneously and at the same location using an infrared camera and thermocouples respectively. The second series measures the incident radiant heat flux as would be received by a small fuel bed volume ahead of the fire line. These measurements are used to compute a fuel bed heat balance for each slope angle (0°, 10°, 20° and 30°). Overall, radiative heating is found to be the heat transfer mechanism that dominates in the slope effect between 0° and 20°, but close to the fire line (<10 cm), the flux due to convective heating is also significant, reaching one-third of the net heat flux at a 20° slope angle. When the slope angle increases from 20° to 30°, the rate of spread rises by a factor of 2.5 due to a marked increase in convective heating, while radiative heating no longer increases. Far from the fire line, cooling by convection is found to be substantial except at the 30° slope angle.

[1]  J.-L Dupuy.  Testing Two Radiative Physical Models for Fire Spread Through Porous Forest Fuel Beds , 2000 .

[2]  F. Albini.  A Model for Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels by-Radiation† , 1985 .

[3]  S. Michaletz,et al.  Foliage influences forced convection heat transfer in conifer branches and buds. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[4]  Paul-Antoine Santoni,et al.  The contribution of radiant heat transfer to laboratory-scale fire spread under the influences of wind and slope , 2001 .

[5]  Jason J. Sharples,et al.  Review of formal methodologies for wind–slope correction of wildfire rate of spread , 2008 .

[6]  Richard H. Grant,et al.  The mutual interference of spruce canopy structural elements , 1984 .

[7]  Jorge C. S. André,et al.  Estimation of the radiation extinction coefficient of natural fuel beds , 2004 .

[8]  J. Dupuy,et al.  Fire spread through a porous forest fuel bed: a radiative and convective model including fire-induced flow effects , 1999 .

[9]  F. Albini.  Wildland Fire Spread by Radiation-a Model Including Fuel Cooling by Natural Convection , 1986 .

[10]  Ian R. Noble,et al.  McArthur's fire-danger meters expressed as equations , 1980 .

[11]  Paul-Antoine Santoni,et al.  A 3D PHYSICAL REAL-TIME MODEL OF SURFACE FIRES ACROSS FUEL BEDS , 2007 .

[12]  J. Dupuy,et al.  Thermal infrared emission–transmission measurements in flames from a cylindrical forest fuel burner , 2007 .

[13]  M. Raupach.  Similarity analysis of the interaction of bushfire plumes with ambient winds , 1990 .

[14]  P. Hamer,et al.  The heat balance of apple buds and blossoms. Part I. Heat transfer in the outdoor environment , 1985 .

[15]  E. A. Catchpole,et al.  Uniform Propagation of a Planar Fire Front Without Wind , 1989 .

[16]  R. M. Nelson.  An effective wind speed for models of fire spread , 2002 .

[17]  Dominique Morvan,et al.  Modeling of fire spread through a forest fuel bed using a multiphase formulation , 2001 .

[18]  A. Collin,et al.  Infrared radiative properties of vegetation involved in forest fires , 2009 .

[19]  P. Baines,et al.  Physical mechanisms for the propagation of surface fires , 1990 .

[20]  Judith Winterkamp,et al.  Coupled influences of topography and wind on wildland fire behaviour , 2007 .

[21]  J. Dupuy,et al.  The effects of slope and fuel bed width on laboratory fire behaviour , 2011 .