Coniferous wood quality in the future: concerns and strategies

SummaryAs the raw material base for forest products manufacturing shifts from old-growth to short-rotation plantation stock, the wood from these younger trees will contain larger proportions of juvenile wood. This in turn will influence the quality of forest products obtained. The pattern of specific gravity variation in these trees, which varies among the five most important Pacific Northwest species groups, is reviewed, and the nature of their differences is related to growth habit. The shade intolerance of some species is speculated to manifest itself in an early culmination of annual height inrement, after which specific gravity increases rapidly to a maximum. This is contrasted to shade-tolerant species, in which specific gravity may take several decades to attain a minimum value, followed by only moderate increases thereafter. In addition, faster growth rates in widely spaced plantation trees tend to depress specific gravity and advance the age at which these trees reach their minimum value, thereby compounding the overall wood density of deficit of short-rotation trees.Lower specific gravity, compounded with reduced lignin content in juvenile wood, negatively influences kraft pulp yield, but not pulp quality parameters such as sheet density, burst and tensile strength. Reduced wood density, coupled with larger fibril angles in juvenile wood, reduces average strength and stiffness of lumber from younger plantation trees. Mechanical stress rating needs to be adopted to segregate the strong, stiff material for engineered construction uses, because a large proportion of visually graded lumber from juvenile wood zones will not meet currently assigned stress values. Mechanical stress rating can ensure a continued stream of appropriate engineering grades from future tree supplies.

[1]  J. J. Vogt,et al.  Mechanical properties of lodgepole pine: 3-inch diameter stems , 1989 .

[2]  M. Micko,et al.  Wood quality of white spruce from north central Alberta , 1984 .

[3]  A. P. Jessome Strength and related properties of woods grown in Canada. , 1977 .

[4]  Honorio F. Carino,et al.  Effect of stand age on flexural properties and grade compliance of lumber from loblolly pine plantation timber , 1993 .

[5]  E. J. Biblis,et al.  Properties and grade yield of lumber from a 27-year-old slash pine plantation , 1990 .

[6]  R. N. Wellwood Specific gravity and tracheid length variations in second-growth Western Hemlock. , 1960 .

[7]  J. Petty,et al.  Variation of density and growth ring width in stems of Sitka and Norway spruce , 1990 .

[8]  F. W. Taylor,et al.  Specific gravity and tracheid length variation of white spruce in Alberta , 1982 .

[9]  P. Koch Gross characteristics of lodgepole pine trees in North America , 1987 .

[10]  G. K. Elliott Wood density in conifers. , 1970 .

[11]  B. Bendtsen,et al.  Property profile of 60-year-old Douglas-fir , 1986 .

[12]  R. W. Kennedy,et al.  Variation in cellulose content of Douglas Fir. , 1960 .

[13]  R. G. Pearson,et al.  Characterization of the strength of juvenile wood of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) , 1971 .

[14]  Bruce J. Zobel,et al.  Wood Variation: Its Causes and Control , 1989 .

[15]  R. W. Kennedy,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND GROWTH RATE ON DRY WOOD PRODUCTION IN PLANTATION-GROWN WHITE SPRUCE , 1967 .

[16]  R. Burns The scientific basis for silvicultural and management decisions in the national forest system , 1989 .

[17]  J. Brazier Timber Improvement I. A Study of the Variation in Wood Characteristics in Young Sitka spruce , 1967 .

[18]  R. G. Pearson,et al.  Effect of fast growth rate on the mechanical properties of loblolly pine , 1980 .

[19]  H. D. Erickson,et al.  Douglas-fir wood quality studies Part II: Effects of age and stimulated growth on fibril angle and chemical constituents , 1974, Wood Science and Technology.

[20]  R. E. Thomas,et al.  Bending strength and stiffness of second-growth Douglas-fir dimension lumber , 1991 .

[21]  D. Weldon,et al.  Comparison of grade, yield, and mechanical properties of lumber produced from young fast-grown and older slow-grown planted slash pine , 1990 .

[22]  E. Morgenstern,et al.  Variation patterns and age relationships of wood density in families of jack pine and black spruce , 1987 .

[23]  G. K. Elliott The distribution of tracheid length in a single stem of Sitka Spruce. , 1960 .

[24]  J. H. Smith Influences of spacing on radial growth and percentage latewood of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar. , 1980 .

[25]  J. Hatton,et al.  Kraft pulping of second-growth lodgepole pine , 1994 .

[26]  Jeffrey D. DeBell,et al.  Wood density of western hemlock: effect of ring width , 1994 .

[27]  J. Beaulieu,et al.  Wood density of natural white spruce populations in Quebec , 1987 .

[28]  P. Savill,et al.  The influence of early respacing on the wood density of Sitka spruce , 1983 .

[29]  J. C. F. Walker,et al.  Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle. , 1994 .

[30]  G. R. Middleton,et al.  A Discussion of Wood Quality Attributes and Their Practical Implications A DISCUSSION OF WOOD QUALITY ATTRIBUTES AND THEIR PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS , 1999 .