Analysis of activity in fMRI data using affinity propagation clustering

Clustering analysis is a promising data-driven method for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. The huge computation load, however, makes it difficult for the practical use. We use affinity propagation clustering (APC), a new clustering algorithm especially for large data sets to detect brain functional activation from fMRI. It considers all data points as possible exemplars through the minimisation of an energy function and message-passing architecture, and obtains the optimal set of exemplars and their corresponding clusters. Four simulation studies and three in vivo fMRI studies reveal that brain functional activation can be effectively detected and that different response patterns can be distinguished using this method. Our results demonstrate that APC is superior to the k-centres clustering, as revealed by their performance measures in the weighted Jaccard coefficient and average squared error. These results suggest that the proposed APC will be useful in detecting brain functional activation from fMRI data.

[1]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Quantification of intensity variations in functional MR images using rotated principal components. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J. Rajapakse,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:283–300(1998) � Modeling Hemodynamic Response for Analysis of Functional MRI Time-Series , 2022 .

[4]  Qin Yang,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Data Using Improved Self-Organizing Mapping and Spatio-Temporal Metric Hierarchical Clustering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Synthetic images by subspace transforms. I. Principal components images and related filters. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[9]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[10]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  H. Benali,et al.  Robust Bayesian estimation of the hemodynamic response function in event‐related BOLD fMRI using basic physiological information , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[17]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[18]  Sadasivan Puthusserypady,et al.  A sparse Bayesian method for determination of flexible design matrix for fMRI data analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[19]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  K. Kojima Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. , 1969 .

[22]  S Makeig,et al.  Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the stroop color-naming task. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Lin Chen,et al.  An integrated neighborhood correlation and hierarchical clustering approach of functional MRI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[25]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[27]  J Xiong,et al.  Assessment and optimization of functional MRI analyses , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[30]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[31]  Marc Mézard,et al.  1993 , 1993, The Winning Cars of the Indianapolis 500.