Life cycle assessment of facile microwave-assisted zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures.

The life cycle assessment of several zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures, fabricated by a facile microwave technique, is presented. Key synthesis parameters such as annealing temperature, varied from 90°C to 220°C, and microwave power, varied from 110W to 710W, are assessed. The effect of these parameters on both the structural characteristics and the environmental sustainability of the nanostructures is examined. The nanostructures were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), Photoluminescence (PL) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. Crystalline size was found to be 22.40nm at 110W microwave power, 24.83nm at 310W, and 24.01nm at 710W. Microwave power and synthesis temperature were both directly proportional to the surface area. At 110W the surface area was 10.44m2/g, at 310W 12.88m2/g, and at 710W 14.60m2/g; while it was found to be 11.64m2/g at 150°C and 18.09m2/g at 220°C. Based on these, a life cycle analysis (LCA) of the produced ZnO nanoparticles was carried out, using the ZnO surface area (1m2/g) as the functional unit. It was found that the main environmental weaknesses identified during the production process were; (a) the use of ethanol for purifying the produced nanomaterials and (b) the electricity consumption for the ZnO calcination, provided by South Africa's fossil-fuel dependent electricity source. When the effect of the key synthesis parameters on environmental sustainability was examined it was found that an increase of either microwave power (from 110 to 710W) or synthesis temperatures (from 90 to 220°C), results in higher sustainability, with the environmental footprint reduced by 27% and 41%, respectively. Through a sensitivity analysis, it was observed that an electricity mix based on renewable energy could improve the environmental sustainability of the nanoparticles by 25%.

[1]  Xinyong Li,et al.  Controllable synthesis of ZnO nanoflowers and their morphology-dependent photocatalytic activities , 2008 .

[2]  George Kiriakidis,et al.  Ultra-low gas sensing utilizing metal oxide thin films , 2012 .

[3]  Pawel L Urban,et al.  Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. , 2009, Waste management.

[4]  Chapter 4 High Surface Area Materials , 1999 .

[5]  J. Dutta,et al.  pH-dependent growth of zinc oxide nanorods , 2009 .

[6]  Anne Kahru,et al.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[7]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[9]  Xiaomin Li,et al.  Flowerlike ZnO nanostructures via hexamethylenetetramine-assisted thermolysis of zinc-ethylenediamine complex. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Photocatalytic Properties of Microwave-Synthesized TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles Using Malachite Green Dye , 2013 .

[11]  Seungho Cho,et al.  Morphology-Controlled Growth of ZnO Nanostructures Using Microwave Irradiation: from Basic to Complex Structures , 2008 .

[12]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Use of a rapid cytotoxicity screening approach to engineer a safer zinc oxide nanoparticle through iron doping. , 2010, ACS nano.

[13]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: limitations and challenges. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[14]  Md. Eaqub Ali,et al.  Effect of different seed solutions on the morphology and electrooptical properties of ZnO nanorods , 2012 .

[15]  Jie Xu,et al.  Outdoor urban nanomaterials: The emergence of a new, integrated, and critical field of study. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Xiaoying Wang,et al.  Biopolymer/montmorillonite nanocomposite: preparation, drug-controlled release property and cytotoxicity , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[17]  S. K. Sadrnezhaad,et al.  Effects of initial precursor and microwave irradiation on step-by-step synthesis of zinc oxide nano-architectures , 2012 .

[18]  A. Alagarasi.  Chapter-INTRODUCTION TO NANOMATERIALS , 2022 .

[19]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[20]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Effect of nickel doping on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO thin films under UV and visible light , 2011 .

[21]  K. T. Hillie,et al.  Temperature-dependence on the structural, optical, and paramagnetic properties of ZnO nanostructures , 2014 .

[22]  CHAPTER 4 CHARACTERIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR NANOMATERIALS , 2022 .

[23]  Hongrui Peng,et al.  Morphological control of flower-like ZnO nanostructures , 2007 .

[24]  X. Sima,et al.  Effects of nano-scale TiO2, ZnO and their bulk counterparts on zebrafish: acute toxicity, oxidative stress and oxidative damage. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[26]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Nanomaterials for environmental studies: classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  S. Zaman,et al.  Influence of pH, precursor concentration, growth time, and temperature on the morphology of ZnO nanostructures grown by the hydrothermal method , 2011 .

[29]  Wen-qing Qin,et al.  Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of single-crystalline α-Fe 2 O 3 nanocubes , 2010 .

[30]  Gaoshan Huang,et al.  Excitation wavelength dependence of the visible photoluminescence from amorphous ZnO granular films , 2008 .

[31]  D. Venieri,et al.  Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Bisphenol A on Immobilized ZnO or TiO2 , 2013 .

[32]  D. Venieri,et al.  Solar photocatalytic decomposition of estrogens over immobilized zinc oxide , 2013 .

[33]  L. Ioannou-Ttofa,et al.  The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through Life Cycle Analysis. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Jianping Xu,et al.  Luminescence Properties of Cobalt-Doped ZnO Films Prepared by Sol–Gel Method , 2013, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[35]  Zishan H. Khan,et al.  Introduction to nanomaterials , 2021, Nanomaterials.

[36]  S. Foteinis,et al.  Life cycle assessment of organic versus conventional agriculture. A case study of lettuce cultivation in Greece , 2016 .