A Sequential Linear Programming Coordination Algorithm for Analytical Target Cascading

Decomposition-based strategies, such as analytical target cascading (ATC), are often employed in design optimization of complex systems. Achieving convergence and computational efficiency in the coordination strategy that solves the partitioned problem is a key challenge. A new convergent strategy is proposed for ATC that coordinates interactions among subproblems using sequential linearizations. The linearity of subproblems is maintained using infinity norms to measure deviations between targets and responses. A subproblem suspension strategy is used to suspend temporarily inclusion of subproblems that do not need significant redesign, based on trust region and target value step size. An individual subproblem trust region method is introduced for faster convergence. The proposed strategy is intended for use in design optimization problems where sequential linearizations are typically effective, such as problems with extensive monotonicities, a large number of constraints relative to variables, and propagation of probabilities with normal distributions. Experiments with test problems show that, relative to standard ATC coordination, the number of subproblem evaluations is reduced considerably while the solution accuracy depends on the degree of monotonicity and nonlinearity.

[1]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1969 .

[2]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  Test examples for nonlinear programming codes , 1980 .

[3]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  More test examples for nonlinear programming codes , 1981 .

[4]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation , 1988 .

[5]  H. Loh,et al.  A Sequential Linearization Approach for Solving Mixed-Discrete Nonlinear Design Optimization Problems , 1991 .

[6]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[7]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[8]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[9]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Optimization of coupled systems : A critical overview of approaches , 1994 .

[10]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[11]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Use of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design , 1996 .

[12]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[13]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization , 1997 .

[14]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Multidisciplinary optimization applications in preliminary design - Status and directions , 1997 .

[15]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[16]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[17]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[18]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis with Response Surfaces , 2000 .

[19]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Development of multiple cycle coupling suspension in the optimization of complex systems , 2001 .

[20]  Sven Leyffer,et al.  Nonlinear programming without a penalty function , 2002, Math. Program..

[21]  Sven Leyffer,et al.  On the Global Convergence of a Filter--SQP Algorithm , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[22]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Aspects of Collaborative Optimization for Multidisciplinary Design , 2002 .

[23]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[24]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  On the global convergence of an SLP–filter algorithm that takes EQP steps , 2003, Math. Program..

[25]  Nachiket Kasarekar,et al.  Development of a Hybrid MDF/IDF Multidisciplinary Optimization Solution Method with Coupling Suspension , 2004 .

[26]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design Optimization of Hierarchically Decomposed Multilevel Systems Under Uncertainty , 2006, DAC 2004.

[27]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Quantification and Use of System Coupling in Decomposed Design Optimization Problems , 2005 .

[28]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Monotonicity and active set strategies in probabilistic design optimization , 2005 .

[29]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  On the Use of Analytical Target Cascading and Collaborative Optimization for Complex System Design , 2005 .

[30]  M. Wiecek,et al.  Lagrangian Coordination and Analytical Target Cascading: Solving ATC-Decomposed Problems with Lagrangian Duality , 2005 .

[31]  M. Kokkolaras,et al.  Probabilistic Analytical Target Cascading: A Moment Matching Formulation for Multilevel Optimization Under Uncertainty , 2006, DAC 2005.

[32]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  AN EFFICIENT WEIGHTING UPDATE METHOD TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE CONSISTENCY DEVIATION IN ANALYTICAL TARGET CASCADING , 2005 .

[33]  J. E. Rooda,et al.  An augmented Lagrangian relaxation for analytical target cascading using the alternating direction method of multipliers , 2006 .

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  Lagrangian coordination for enhancing the convergence of analytical target cascading , 2006 .

[35]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Diagonal Quadratic Approximation for Parallelization of Analytical Target Cascading , 2007, DAC 2007.

[36]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  An Adaptive Sequential Linear Programming Algorithm for Optimal Design Problems With Probabilistic Constraints , 2007 .