The effects of conventional extracorporeal circulation versus miniaturized extracorporeal circulation on microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES To reduce the complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during cardiac surgery, many modifications have been made to conventional extracorporeal circulation systems. This trend has led to the development of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation systems. Cardiac surgery using conventional extracorporeal circulation systems has been associated with significantly reduced microcirculatory perfusion, but it remains unknown whether this could be prevented by an mECC system. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that microcirculatory perfusion decreases with the use of a conventional extracorporeal circulation system and would be preserved with the use of an miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system. METHODS Microcirculatory density and perfusion were assessed using sublingual side stream dark-field imaging in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery before, during and after the use of either a conventional extracorporeal circulation system (n = 10) or a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system (n = 10). In addition, plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and creatinine levels and creatinine clearance were assessed up to 5 days post-surgery to monitor renal function. RESULTS At the end of the CPB, one patient in the miniaturized extracorporeal circulation-treated group and five patients in the conventional extracorporeal circulation-treated group received one bag of packed red blood cells (300 ml). During the CPB, the haematocrit and haemoglobin levels were slightly higher in the miniaturized extracorporeal circulation-treated patients compared with the conventional extracorporeal circulation-treated patients (27.7 ± 3.3 vs 24.7 ± 2.0%; P = 0.03; and 6.42 ± 0.75 vs 5.41 ± 0.64 mmol/l; P < 0.01). The density of perfused vessels with a diameter <25 µm (i.e. perfused vessel density) decreased slightly in the conventional extracorporeal circulation-treated group from 16.4 ± 3.8 to 12.8 ± 3.3 mm/mm(2) (P < 0.01) and remained stable in the miniaturized extracorporeal circulation-treated group (16.3 ± 2.7 and 15.2 ± 2.9 mm/mm(2) before and during the pump, respectively). Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels were increased following the use of extracorporeal circulation in both groups, and no differences were observed between the groups. Plasma creatinine levels and creatinine clearance were not affected by CABG surgery or CPB. CONCLUSIONS The results from this relatively small study suggest that the use of the miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system is associated with a statistically significant (but clinically insignificant) reduction in haemodilution and microcirculatory hypoperfusion compared with the use of the conventional extracorporeal circulation system.

[1]  B. Atasever,et al.  Distinct alterations in sublingual microcirculatory blood flow and hemoglobin oxygenation in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[2]  F. Biancari,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery , 2009, Heart.

[3]  J. Dunning,et al.  Can a mini-bypass circuit improve perfusion in cardiac surgery compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass? , 2009, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[4]  S. Teerenstra,et al.  The effect of hemodilution during normothermic cardiac surgery on renal physiology and function: a review , 2008, Perfusion.

[5]  B. Bein,et al.  Is there really a clinical benefit of using minimized extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass grafting? , 2008, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[6]  C. Ince,et al.  Sidestream Dark Field (SDF) imaging: a novel stroboscopic LED ring-based imaging modality for clinical assessment of the microcirculation. , 2007, Optics express.

[7]  A. Anselmi,et al.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bypass Grafting With Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation System (MECC) Versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  G. Ospina-Tascón,et al.  How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference , 2007, Critical care.

[9]  J. Laas,et al.  Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleeding and air entrainment: an in vivo clinical perspective. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  J. Laas,et al.  Reduction in blood product usage associated with routine use of mini bypass systems in extracorporeal circulation , 2007, Perfusion.

[11]  T. Vähäsilta,et al.  New mini-extracorporeal circulation system (ECC.O) is a safe technique in coronary surgery , 2007, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[12]  O. Ponzio,et al.  Comparison of the inflammatory response between miniaturized and standard CPB circuits in aortic valve surgery. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[13]  P. Risteski,et al.  The use of minimized extracorporeal circulation system has a beneficial effect on hemostasis--a randomized clinical study. , 2006, The heart surgery forum.

[14]  M. Elahi,et al.  Deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery surgery and scientific interpretation of off‐pump's logic , 2006, Acute cardiac care.

[15]  Samer A. Kseibi,et al.  Comparison of conventional extracorporeal circulation and minimal extracorporeal circulation with respect to microbubbles and microembolic signals , 2005, Perfusion.

[16]  R. Habib,et al.  Role of hemodilutional anemia and transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in renal injury after coronary revascularization: Implications on operative outcome* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[17]  J. Albes,et al.  Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system. , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  V. Rao,et al.  Hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass is an independent risk factor for acute renal failure in adult cardiac surgery. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  O. Ponzio,et al.  Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  M. Underwood,et al.  Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  K V Arom,et al.  Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  R. M. Nelson,et al.  Development of a pump-oxygenator to replace the heart and lungs; an apparatus applicable to human patients, and application to one case. , 1951, Annals of surgery.

[23]  G. Gravlee Microcirculatory Alterations in Cardiac Surgery: Effects of Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Anesthesia , 2010 .

[24]  L. Kjeldsen,et al.  Characterization of two ELISAs for NGAL, a newly described lipocalin in human neutrophils. , 1996, Journal of immunological methods.

[25]  Cockcroft Dw,et al.  Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine , 1976 .