Computational Approaches for Analyzing Latent Social Structures in Open Source Organizing

Open source software represents a novel form of organizing that leaves digital trace data for organizational researchers to analyze using computational methods. Computational social science has emerged as an important approach to understanding patterns that represent latent social structures in sociological, organizational, and technical phenomena. Within the context of open and digitalized collaboration the clearest manifestation of computational social science has been social network analysis. While social network analysis is a powerful approach for understanding social phenomena in terms of their latent relational social structure, the network lens does not capture the entirety of social structures. Procedural social structures undergirding recurrent patterns of action form another important element of latent social structure. Analyzing such structures requires alternative methods able to deal with historydependent patterning of activities. Therefore, we investigate the concepts of latent relational and procedural structures, and discuss computational approaches for analyzing patterns and interdependencies among such structures.

[1]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[4]  Michael W. Godfrey,et al.  Evolution in open source software: a case study , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Software Maintenance.

[5]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[6]  Ydd b.,et al.  Theories of Communication , 2015 .

[7]  A. Pentland,et al.  Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science: Science , 2009 .

[8]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[9]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open source software community , 2011, First Monday.

[10]  R. Solé,et al.  Self-organization versus hierarchy in open-source social networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Greg Madey,et al.  THE OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHENOMENON: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON SOCIAL NETWORK THEORY , 2002 .

[12]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[13]  Gilbert Ritschard,et al.  Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR , 2011 .

[14]  Anjo Anjewierden,et al.  Understanding Weblog Communities Through Digital Traces: A Framework, a Tool and an Example , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[15]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Sequencing Design DNA: a Set of Methodological Artifacts for sequencing Socio-Technical Design Routines , 2010, ICIS.

[16]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[18]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[19]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Coming of the New Organization , 2001 .

[20]  A. Abbott,et al.  Measuring Resemblance in Sequence Data: An Optimal Matching Analysis of Musicians' Careers , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[23]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[24]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[25]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[26]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[27]  Lawrence L. Wu Some Comments on “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect” , 2000 .

[28]  Martin Kilduff,et al.  A Paradigm Too Far? A Dynamic Stability Reconsideration of the Social Network Research Program , 2006 .

[29]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[30]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[31]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Networks Evolving Step by Step: Statistical Analysis of Dyadic Event Data , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[32]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[33]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[35]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[36]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[37]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm , 2000, ICIS.

[38]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective , 2015 .

[39]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Toward Generalizable Sociomaterial Inquiry: A Computational Approach for Zooming In and Out of Sociomaterial Routines , 2014, MIS Q..

[41]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  Variable Length Markov Chains: Methodology, Computing, and Software , 2004 .

[42]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[43]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[44]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  From Causes to Events , 1992 .

[45]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[46]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research , 2007 .

[47]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Entrainment--cycles and synergy in organizational behavior , 1992 .

[48]  A. Capiluppi Improving comprehension and cooperation through code structure , 2004, ICSE 2004.

[49]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[50]  Keith H. Bennett,et al.  A Staged Model for the Software Life Cycle , 2000, Computer.

[51]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Emergence of New Project Teams from Open Source Software Developer Networks: Impact of Prior Collaboration Ties , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Adapting the "staged model for software evolution" to free/libre/open source software , 2007, IWPSE '07.

[53]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[54]  Stefan Koch,et al.  Evolution of Open Source Software Systems - A Large-Scale Investigation , 2005 .

[55]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Core and Periphery in Free/Libre and Open Source Software Team Communications , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[56]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[57]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[58]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[59]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. , 1962 .

[60]  J. Coleman Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods , 1958 .

[61]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Collaboration through Open Superposition , 2022 .

[62]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[63]  Antonio A. Casilli,et al.  ‘‘An Ethnographic Seduction’’: How Qualitative Research and Agent-based Models can Benefit Each Other , 2010 .

[64]  J. R Hackman,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing teams , 1990 .

[65]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[66]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action , 2008 .

[68]  Kieran Healy,et al.  The Ecology of Open-Source Software Development , 2003 .

[69]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[70]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[73]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[74]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[75]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Analysis of Activity in the Open Source Software Development Community , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[76]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[77]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[78]  James M. Bieman,et al.  The FreeBSD project: a replication case study of open source development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[79]  Stefan Koch,et al.  Effort, co‐operation and co‐ordination in an open source software project: GNOME , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[80]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[81]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[82]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[83]  M. Feldman A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[84]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of distributed work , 2000 .

[85]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[86]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Coordination practices within FLOSS development teams: The bug fixing process , 2004, Computer Supported Acitivity Coordination.

[87]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[88]  Alessandro Lomi,et al.  Dynamic Models of Affiliation and the Network Structure of Problem Solving in an Open Source Software Project , 2012 .

[89]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Structure and Process in Modern Societies , 1961 .

[90]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Keeping It Going: the Everyday Practices of Open Source Software , 2022 .

[91]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Evolution and growth in large libre software projects , 2005, Eighth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE'05).

[92]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[93]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[94]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[95]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  The Myth of Social Network Analysis as a Special Method in the Social Sciences , 1990 .

[96]  Jr. Richard J. Boland The Tyranny of Space in Organizational Analysis , 1999 .

[97]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[98]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 2013 .