Design and simulation of a UOIT copper–chlorine cycle for hydrogen production

A design and simulation study of the four‐step copper–chlorine (Cu–Cl) cycle using Aspen Plus software (Aspen Technology Inc., Cambridge, MA)is reported. The simulation consists of four main sections: hydrolysis, oxy‐decomposition, electrolysis, and drying. This paper explains and justifies how the actual reaction kinetics is factored into these four main sections. Also, it illustrates all the process units that are used in the simulation of four‐step Cu–Cl cycle, providing their associated specifications and design parameters. It is found that hydrolysis reactors with smaller capacities and larger (≥10/1) steam to CuCl ratios were desirable to increase the reaction efficiency and prevent the formation of side products such as CuO and CuC. In contrast, larger capacity oxy‐decomposition reactors with longer residence times are preferable to allow enough time for the copper oxychloride to decompose. Therefore, 10 (or more) small‐scale hydrolysis reactors can feed one oxy‐decomposition reactor with large capacity to keep continuity of the flow in the overall cycle. On the basis of the process flow sheet, a pinch analysis is developed for an integrated heat exchange network to enable effective heat recovery within the Cu–Cl cycle. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Naterer,et al.  Nuclear‐based hydrogen production with a thermochemical copper–chlorine cycle and supercritical water reactor: equipment scale‐up and process simulation , 2012 .

[2]  William R. Smith,et al.  Clean hydrogen production with the Cu–Cl cycle – Progress of international consortium, I: Experimental unit operations , 2011 .

[3]  I. Dincer,et al.  Exergy analysis of heat exchangers in the copper–chlorine thermochemical cycle to enhance thermal effectiveness and cycle efficiency , 2011 .

[4]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Canada’s program on nuclear hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle , 2010 .

[5]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Heat recovery from molten CuCl in the Cu–Cl cycle of hydrogen production , 2010 .

[6]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Diffusion of gaseous products through a particle surface layer in a fluidized bed reactor , 2010 .

[7]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Solid particle decomposition and hydrolysis reaction kinetics in Cu–Cl thermochemical hydrogen production , 2010 .

[8]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermophysical properties of copper compounds in copper–chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycles , 2010 .

[9]  E. Easton,et al.  Ceramic carbon electrode-based anodes for use in the Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle ☆ , 2010 .

[10]  G. Naterer,et al.  Comparison of sulfur–iodine and copper–chlorine thermochemical hydrogen production cycles , 2010 .

[11]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Kinetics study of the copper/hydrochloric acid reaction for thermochemical hydrogen production , 2010 .

[12]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Hydrolysis of CuCl2 in the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production: Experimental studies using a spray reactor with an ultrasonic atomizer , 2010 .

[13]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Hydrogen production by the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle: Investigation of the key step of hydrolysing CuCl2 to Cu2OCl2 and HCl using a spray reactor , 2010 .

[14]  Lixuan Lu,et al.  Design and reliability assessment of control systems for a nuclear-based hydrogen production plant with copper–chlorine thermochemical cycle , 2010 .

[15]  E. Easton,et al.  High performance ceramic carbon electrode-based anodes for use in the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production , 2010 .

[16]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Equilibrium conversion in Cu–Cl cycle multiphase processes of hydrogen production , 2009 .

[17]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles-part III further development of the Cu-Cl cycle. , 2009 .

[18]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  The evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles – Part II: The down-selection process , 2009 .

[19]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Recent Canadian advances in nuclear-based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle , 2009 .

[20]  G. Naterer,et al.  Multiphase reactor scale-up for Cu–Cl thermochemical hydrogen production , 2008 .

[21]  G. Naterer,et al.  Cost analysis of a thermochemical Cu–Cl pilot plant for nuclear-based hydrogen production , 2008 .

[22]  Cletus Chukwu,et al.  PROCESS ANALYSIS AND ASPEN PLUS SIMULATION OF NUCLEAR-BASED HYDROGEN PRODUCTION WITH A COPPER-CHLORINE CYCLE , 2008 .

[23]  K. Kornbluth.  ESTIMATES OF HYDROGEN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COSTS FROM CALIFORNIA LANDFILL GAS , 2007 .

[24]  K. R. Schultz,et al.  HIGH EFFICIENCY GENERATION OF HYDROGEN FUELS USING NUCLEAR POWER FINAL RECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 1999 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 REV. 1 , 2003 .

[25]  L. Brown.  High Efficiency Generation of Hydrogen Fuels Using Nuclear Power for the period November 1, 2001- January 31, 2001 , 2002 .