Self-Estrangement & Deep Brain Stimulation: Ethical Issues Related to Forced Explantation

Although being generally safe, the use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been associated with a significant number of patients experiencing postoperative psychological and neurological harm within experimental trials (i.e. self-estrangement, hypersexuality, hypomania, suicidality, impulse control disorders, etc.). A proportion of these postoperative severe adverse effects have lead to the decision to medically prescribe device deactivation or removal. However, there is little debate in the literature as to what is in the patient’s best interest when device removal has been prescribed; in particular, what should be the conceptual approach to ethically guide the decision to remove or maintain implants. The purpose of this article is to examine the ethical issues raised when patients refuse brain device explantation despite medical prescription. In order to illustrate these issues, we report and discuss a clinical case involving a patient suffering from treatment resistant depression who experienced forms of postoperative self-estrangement, as well as suicidal attempts, but who resists giving consent to device explantation.

[1]  A. Lozano,et al.  Subcallosal Cingulate Gyrus Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Nir Lipsman,et al.  Brain, Mind and Machine: What are the Implications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Perceptions of Personal Identity, Agency and Free Will? , 2013, Bioethics.

[3]  A. Benabid,et al.  Long term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on cognitive function, mood, and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[4]  Suzanne N Haber,et al.  Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior, and thought. , 2009, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  H. Walter,et al.  Reviewing Autonomy: Implications of the Neurosciences and the Free Will Debate for the Principle of Respect for the Patient's Autonomy , 2010, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[6]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours , 2013, Neuroethics.

[7]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Permanent Neurological Deficit Related to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Patient with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes for Parkinson’s Disease: Case Report , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[8]  E. Racine,et al.  Ethical Guidance for the Use of Deep Brain Stimulation in Psychiatric Trials and Emerging Uses: Review and Reflections , 2012 .

[9]  Y. Agid,et al.  Neurosurgery in Parkinson's disease: the doctor is happy, the patient less so? , 2006, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum.

[10]  Shin-Yuan Chen,et al.  Hypomania with hypersexuality following bilateral anterior limb stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  Felicitas Kraemer Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation , 2011, Neuroethics.

[12]  P. Ford Neurosurgical Implants: Clinical Protocol Considerations , 2007, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[13]  D. Simeon,et al.  Feeling unreal: a depersonalization disorder update of 117 cases. , 2003, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[14]  Megan M. Filkowski,et al.  Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. , 2012, Archives of general psychiatry.

[15]  Y Agid,et al.  Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease , 2006, Neurology.

[16]  F. Gilbert,et al.  The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment , 2012, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[17]  Y. Agid,et al.  Psychosocial adjustment after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[18]  Aviva Abosch,et al.  Long-term Hardware-related Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Bara Ricou,et al.  Research in critically ill patients: standards of informed consent , 2007, Critical care.

[20]  M. Oliveira,et al.  Depicting depersonalization disorder. , 2013 .

[21]  Maartje Schermer Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, Neuroethics.

[22]  J. Voges,et al.  Deep-brain stimulation: long-term analysis of complications caused by hardware and surgery—experiences from a single centre , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[23]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Involuntary & Voluntary Invasive Brain Surgery: Ethical Issues Related to Acquired Aggressiveness , 2013 .

[24]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation and Postoperative Suicidality Among Treatment Resistant Depression Patients: Should Eligibility Protocols Exclude Patients with a History of Suicide Attempts and Anger/Impulsivity? , 2013 .

[25]  Françoise Baylis,et al.  “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity from Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Neuroethics.