Cell recognition based on topological sparse coding for microscopy imaging of focused ultrasound treatment

BackgroundUltrasound is considered a reliable, widely available, non-invasive, and inexpensive imaging technique for assessing and detecting the development phases of cancer; both in vivo and ex vivo, and for understanding the effects on cell cycle and viability after ultrasound treatment.MethodsBased on the topological continuity characteristics, and that adjacent points or areas represent similar features, we propose a topological penalized convex objective function of sparse coding, to recognize similar cell phases.ResultsThis method introduces new features using a deep learning method of sparse coding with topological continuity characteristics. Large-scale comparison tests demonstrate that the RAW can outperform SIFT GIST and HoG as the input features with this method, achieving higher sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and accuracy.ConclusionsExperimental results show that the proposed topological sparse coding technique is valid and effective for extracting new features, and the proposed system was effective for cell recognition of microscopy images of theMDA-MB-231 cell line. This method allows features from sparse coding learning methods to have topological continuity characteristics, and the RAW features are more applicable for the deep learning of the topological sparse coding method than SIFT GIST and HoG.

[1]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Segmentation of MR images via discriminative dictionary learning and sparse coding: Application to hippocampus labeling , 2013, NeuroImage.

[2]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Informatics challenges of high-throughput microscopy , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Task-Driven Dictionary Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Meng Wang,et al.  Novel cell segmentation and online SVM for cell cycle phase identification in automated microscopy , 2008, Bioinform..

[5]  Julien Mairal,et al.  Proximal Methods for Hierarchical Sparse Coding , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks , 2003, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[8]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  B. Baguley,et al.  In vitro modelling of human tumour behaviour in drug discovery programmes. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[10]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  An Effective System for Optical Microscopy Cell Image Segmentation, Tracking and Cell Phase Identification , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[12]  Catherine Wong,et al.  Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[13]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Cell segmentation in phase contrast microscopy images via semi-supervised classification over optics-related features , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  J. Lebrun,et al.  Activin and TGFβ regulate expression of the microRNA-181 family to promote cell migration and invasion in breast cancer cells. , 2013, Cellular signalling.

[16]  András Lörincz,et al.  Sparse and silent coding in neural circuits , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[17]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[18]  Chen Bian,et al.  Steroid receptor coactivator-1: A versatile regulator and promising therapeutic target for breast cancer , 2013, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[19]  David M. Bradley,et al.  Differentiable Sparse Coding , 2008, NIPS.

[20]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Efficient sparse coding algorithms , 2006, NIPS.

[21]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[22]  J. Andrew Bagnell,et al.  Differential Sparse Coding , 2008 .

[23]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , 2014 .

[24]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Spatiotemporal mitosis event detection in time-lapse phase contrast microscopy image sequences , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[25]  Nicolas Brieu,et al.  Image-based Characterization of Thrombus Formation in Time-lapse DIC Microscopy: Segmentation under Low Contrast and Highly Dynamic Imaging Conditions , 2012 .

[26]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Universal Regularizers for Robust Sparse Coding and Modeling , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[28]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Automated 2D detection of construction equipment and workers from site video streams using histograms of oriented gradients and colors , 2013 .

[29]  Joakim Lindblad,et al.  Algorithms for Cytoplasm Segmentation of Fluorescence Labelled Cells , 2002, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.