In Pursuit of Fully Flexible Protein‐Ligand Docking: Modeling the Bilateral Mechanism of Binding

Modern structure‐based drug design aims at accounting for the intrinsic flexibility of therapeutic relevant targets. Over the last few years a considerable amount of docking approaches that encounter this challenging problem has emerged. Here we provide the readership with an overview of established methods for fully flexible protein‐ligand docking and current developments in the field. All methods are based on one of two fundamental models which describe the dynamic behavior of proteins upon ligand binding. Methods for ensemble docking (ED) model the protein conformational change before the ligand is placed, whereas induced‐fit docking (IFD) optimizes the protein structure afterwards. A third category of docking approaches is formed by recent approaches that follow both concepts. This categorization allows to comprehensively discover strengths and weaknesses of the individual processes and to extract information for their applicability in real world docking scenarios.

[1]  Erin S. Bolstad,et al.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: The role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking , 2008, Proteins.

[2]  Jozef Hritz,et al.  Impact of plasticity and flexibility on docking results for cytochrome P450 2D6: a combined approach of molecular dynamics and ligand docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[4]  Erik Lindahl,et al.  Refinement of docked protein–ligand and protein–DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  I. Luque,et al.  Structural stability of binding sites: Consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects , 2000, Proteins.

[6]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T. Oas,et al.  Conformational selection or induced fit: A flux description of reaction mechanism , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Gready,et al.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Akiko Itai,et al.  Effective handling of induced‐fit motion in flexible docking , 2006, Proteins.

[12]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[14]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  FDS: Flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft‐core energy function , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  Ajay N. Jain Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[16]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.

[18]  Lisa Yan,et al.  Fully Automated Molecular Mechanics Based Induced Fit Protein-Ligand Docking Method , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[19]  E. Fischer Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[20]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Consistent Improvement of Cross-Docking Results Using Binding Site Ensembles Generated with Elastic Network Normal Modes , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  R M Stroud,et al.  Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.

[24]  A. di Nola,et al.  Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.

[25]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in protein–ligand binding: The minimal rotation hypothesis , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Molecular docking using shape descriptors , 1992 .

[27]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  IRECS: A new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side‐chain conformations in protein models , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  Automated site-directed drug design using molecular lattices , 1992 .

[29]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  A natural coarse graining for simulating large biomolecular motion. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[31]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Michel F Sanner,et al.  FLIPDock: Docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors , 2007, Proteins.

[33]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Richard Lavery,et al.  Docking macromolecules with flexible segments , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[37]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[38]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Principles of flexible protein–protein docking , 2008, Proteins.

[39]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[40]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[41]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Assessing energy functions for flexible docking , 1998 .

[42]  Gert Vriend,et al.  Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA—a self‐parameterizing force field , 2002, Proteins.

[43]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[44]  J. Richardson,et al.  The penultimate rotamer library , 2000, Proteins.

[45]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  EUDOC: a computer program for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  On the relation between residue flexibility and local solvent accessibility in proteins , 2009, Proteins.

[47]  J. Skolnick,et al.  What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins? , 2007, Proteins.

[48]  Ming Lei,et al.  Sampling protein conformations and pathways , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[49]  Markus Wagener,et al.  A flexible approach to induced fit docking. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[50]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[52]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[53]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  Modeling correlated main‐chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition , 2004, Proteins.

[54]  Alex Gutteridge,et al.  Conformational change in substrate binding, catalysis and product release: an open and shut case? , 2004, FEBS letters.

[55]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE) , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[56]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[57]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  I Lasters,et al.  Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[59]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory , 2001, Proteins.

[60]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[61]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[62]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Antigen recognition by conformational selection , 1999, FEBS letters.

[64]  Chung F Wong,et al.  Flexible ligand-flexible protein docking in protein kinase systems. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[65]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[66]  L. Kavraki,et al.  Multiscale characterization of protein conformational ensembles , 2009, Proteins.

[67]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  NOMAD-Ref: visualization, deformation and refinement of macromolecular structures based on all-atom normal mode analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[68]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Elastic Potential Grids: Accurate and Efficient Representation of Intermolecular Interactions for Fully Flexible Docking , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[69]  X. Barril,et al.  Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design , 2006, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[70]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Improving database enrichment through ensemble docking , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[71]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[72]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[73]  Tania Pencheva,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article AMMOS: Automated Molecular Mechanics Optimization tool for in silico Screening , 2022 .

[74]  C. Milstein,et al.  Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility and dynamics using constraint theory. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[76]  Hao Wang,et al.  Active Site Pressurization: A New Tool for Structure-Guided Drug Design and Other Studies of Protein Flexibility , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[77]  Erin S. Bolstad,et al.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: Pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking , 2009, Proteins.

[78]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Protein-ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[79]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  A hybrid method of molecular dynamics and harmonic dynamics for docking of flexible ligand to flexible receptor , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[80]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[81]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Flexible side chain models improve enrichment rates in in silico screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[82]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[83]  Christoph A Sotriffer,et al.  "In situ cross-docking" to simultaneously address multiple targets. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[84]  Michel F. Sanner,et al.  Hierarchical and multi-resolution representation of protein flexibility , 2006, Bioinform..

[85]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Predicting structural effects in HIV‐1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side‐chain optimization , 1998, Proteins.

[86]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[87]  H. Carlson Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[88]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[89]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[90]  Jerome Nilmeier,et al.  Multiscale Monte Carlo Sampling of Protein Sidechains: Application to Binding Pocket Flexibility. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[91]  A R Leach,et al.  Exploring the conformational space of protein side chains using dead‐end elimination and the A* algorithm , 1998, Proteins.

[92]  R Nussinov,et al.  Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers , 1998, Proteins.

[93]  M L Teodoro,et al.  Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. , 2003, Current pharmaceutical design.

[94]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules, 1. Development and Validation of FITTED 1.0 , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[95]  Lisa Yan,et al.  The dominant role of side‐chain backbone interactions in structural realization of amino acid code. ChiRotor: A side‐chain prediction algorithm based on side‐chain backbone interactions , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[96]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[97]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding , 2000, Proteins.

[99]  Richard A. Lewis,et al.  Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[100]  M. DePristo,et al.  Is one solution good enough? , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[101]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[102]  D S Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of autodock , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.