Towards a land management approach to ecological restoration to encourage stakeholder participation

In the field of ecological restoration, many authors call for more stakeholder participation in the process of restoration. In their opinion, when a restoration project is planned, the range of points of view and the knowledge of local stakeholders need to be taken into account to limit the risk of failure. Although effective stakeholder involvement is often cited as a factor of success, in practice, it is far from systematic. To understand the ways in which the stakeholders actually participate in projects and their opinion of the projects, we analysed three restoration projects. We interviewed the people who would be affected by the projects in the French Pyrenean Mountains: inhabitants, livestock farmers, and other users of the territory, site managers, locally elected officials, experts, and development agents. Our results revealed that how interviewees viewed the outcome and the success of a restoration project depended on their own activity, which also influenced the way they viewed and defined the territory concerned by restoration. Two different perceptions of ecological restoration objectives and approaches coexist in the Pyrenees. The first is highly technical and the aim is simply to restore the original plant cover. In this case, the ‘territory’ is limited to the area to be restored and its immediate surroundings. The second perception of restoration takes into account both past and other possible land uses and consequently concerns a larger territory and the users of the site to be restored. If the participation of local actors in the restoration process is desired, we recommend a comprehensive land management approach to ecological restoration, as this approach is more likely to arouse the interest of the stakeholders.

[1]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[2]  Kai N. Lee.  Appraising Adaptive Management , 1999 .

[3]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[4]  Rutger van der Brugge,et al.  Facing the Adaptive Management Challenge: Insights from Transition Management , 2007 .

[5]  F. Berkes,et al.  Multi-level Participation for Building Adaptive Capacity: Formal Agency-Community Interactions in Northern Kenya , 2011 .

[6]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Case and Situation Analysis , 1983 .

[7]  D. Benson,et al.  Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: Processes, communities, outputs and outcomes , 2014 .

[8]  Eric Higgs,et al.  What is Good Ecological Restoration? , 1997 .

[9]  M. Stokes,et al.  Social‐Psychological Principles of Community‐Based Conservation and Conservancy Motivation: Attaining Goals within an Autonomy‐Supportive Environment , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  R. Gregory,et al.  Science, Uncertainty, and Values in Ecological Restoration: A Case Study in Structured Decision‐Making and Adaptive Management , 2013 .

[11]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  Katharine N. Suding,et al.  Do We Practice What We Preach? Goal Setting for Ecological Restoration , 2013 .

[13]  A. Langley,et al.  Volume 9, No. 3. Special Issue: " Doing Case Study Research in Organizations " Perspectives on Doing Case Study Research in Organizations Introduction: the Nature of Case Study Research , 2022 .

[14]  H. Possingham,et al.  Active Adaptive Management for Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  J. Cairns.  Ecosocietal Restoration: Reestablishing Humanity's Relationship with Natural Systems. , 1995 .

[16]  E. Sabine G. Schreiber,et al.  Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application , 2004 .

[17]  A. David.  Etude de cas et généralisation scientifique en sciences de gestion , 2003 .

[18]  L. Emmelin,et al.  Communicative Approaches to Restoration Ecology: A case study from Dovre Mountain and Svalbard, Norway , 2002 .

[19]  Jai Ranganathan,et al.  When Agendas Collide: Human Welfare and Biological Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Barry L. Johnson,et al.  The Role of Adaptive Management as an Operational Approach for Resource Management Agencies , 1999 .

[21]  E. Higgs,et al.  The Politics of Ecological Restoration , 1996 .

[22]  Nathalie Couix.  Concerted approach to land-use management : developing common working procedures. A Cevennes case-study (France) , 2002 .

[23]  R. Bruce Hull,et al.  Beyond Biology: toward a More Public Ecology for Conservation , 2001 .

[24]  M. Weggeman.  Sensemaking in organisations , 1996 .

[25]  C. Twyman.  Participatory Conservation? Community‐based Natural Resource Management in Botswana , 2000 .

[26]  E. O’rourke.  The reintroduction of the white-tailed sea eagle to Ireland: People and wildlife , 2014 .

[27]  Niels Röling,et al.  Adaptive management: potential and limitations for ecological governance , 2000 .

[28]  Michael James Howes,et al.  Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[29]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[30]  C. Prell,et al.  Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review , 2006 .

[31]  J. Lasseur,et al.  Le sens des pratiques : conceptions d'agriculteurs et modèles d'agronomes , 2004 .

[32]  M. Stenseke.  Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden , 2009 .

[33]  Laurent Hazard,et al.  Rethinking Partnerships with the Aim of Producing Knowledge with Practical Relevance: a Case Study in the Field of Ecological Restoration , 2008 .

[34]  F. Berkes.  Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation , 2004 .

[35]  A. Booth,et al.  Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities , 2011 .

[36]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Primed for Change: Developing Ecological Restoration for the 21st Century , 2013 .

[37]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[38]  E. Higgs,et al.  The Two‐Culture Problem: Ecological Restoration and the Integration of Knowledge , 2005 .

[39]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance: Practitioners' Perspectives , 2011 .

[40]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[41]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[42]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes , 2011 .

[43]  M. Weber.  Economy and society : an outline of interpretive sociology , 2008 .

[44]  Restoring the Narrative of American Environmentalism , 2013 .

[45]  Eric Higgs.  Nature by Design , 2000 .

[46]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[47]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[49]  E. Comerford.  The impact of permanent protection on cost and participation in a conservation programme: a case study from Queensland , 2013 .