MultiMind: Multi-Brain Signal Fusion to Exceed the Power of a Single Brain

We propose a Multi-Brain (multi bio-signal) Fusion (MBF) technology, which consists in the aggregation and analysis of brain and other biometric signals collected from a number of individuals. Often performed in the context of some common stimulus, MBF aims to facilitate rapid/enhanced collective analysis and decision making, or to assess aggregate characteristics, such as a group emotional index (GEI). The wide range of potential applications may justify an ongoing, distributed program of research into the biometric correlates of conscious and unconscious human cognitive functions (practical intelligence). An example is MBF-enabled joint analysis, which would combine cues from several intelligence analysts who are examining the same visual scene in order to rapidly highlight important features that might not be salient to any individual analyst, and which might be difficult to elicit from the group by conventional means. An experiment in presented in which a GEI is obtained by aggregating the information from two people wearing EMOTIV Epoc™ 'neuroheadsets', which collect electroencephalogram (EEG) / electromyogram (EMG) signals from 14 sensors on the scalp. As subjects watch a sequence of slides with emotion-triggering content, their decoded emotions are fused to provide a group emotional response, a collective assessment of the presented information. MBF has the potential to surpass single-brain limitations by accessing and integrating more information than can be usefully shared within even small human groups by means of speech, prosody, facial expression and other nonverbal means One may speculate that the automated aggregation of signals from multiple human brains may open a path to super-human intelligence.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  15 years of BCI research at graz university of technology: current projects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  M. Sams,et al.  EEG and MEG brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[5]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[6]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  The Berlin brain-computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Emotional States Estimation from Multichannel EEG Maps , 2008 .

[8]  Amit Konar,et al.  Emotion clustering from stimulated electroencephalographic signals using a Duffing oscillator , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Heal..

[9]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Self-regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials: A New Treatment for Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2006, Pediatrics.

[10]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[11]  M. Thulasidas,et al.  Robust classification of EEG signal for brain-computer interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Conscious perception of brain states: mental strategies for brain–computer communication , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Brain–computer interface (BCI) operation: optimizing information transfer rates , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Marc O. Ernst Decisions Made Better , 2010, Science.

[17]  Daniel J Simons Monkeying around with the gorillas in our midst: familiarity with an inattentional-blindness task does not improve the detection of unexpected events , 2010, i-Perception.

[18]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[19]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[20]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain-computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.