Occupational Therapy Students' Perceptions of the Role of Robots in the Care for Older People Living in the Community

Background The question arises how recent developments in robotics can contribute to the care for older people. The study is part of the EU-funded ENRICHME project. Objectives of Study The aim of the study was to investigate opinions of occupational therapy students (OTS), as future professional caregivers, on the use of robots in care for older people. Methods It included 26 OTS from Poznan University of Medical Sciences. To collect data, the Users' Needs, Requirements, and Abilities Questionnaire (UNRAQ) was developed. Findings OTS perceived the robot as “a useful device” and “an assistant” rather than “a companion” (p < 0.01). In their opinion, the most important functions of the robot were related to health aspects (emergency alarms, health parameters monitoring, physical activity and memory training, and reminders about medication, drinks, etc.), scored positively by 23–26 OTS. Functions such as mood detection, encouraging to contact with friends, and monitoring of food consumption were accepted by 16-17 OTS. Two statements concerning social functions (accompanying in everyday activities and decreasing the sense of loneliness) were rated positively by less the than half of the participants. Limitations and Recommendations for Further Research A module concerning technology use, including robotics, should constitute an important part of the curricula of both academic and continuous education of OTS.

[1]  David Geer,et al.  Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  In search of good ideas for occupational therapy , 1994 .

[3]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Relationship between interaction with the mental commit robot and change of stress reaction of the elderly , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium (Cat. No.03EX694).

[4]  H. Corriveau,et al.  A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  Wendy B. Stav Occupational Therapy and Older Drivers: Research, Education, and Practice , 2008, Gerontology & geriatrics education.

[6]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  I. Gélinas,et al.  Occupational therapists use of cognitive interventions for clients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2010, Occupational therapy international.

[8]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Older Adults’ Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for Everyday Living Tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[10]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Roger Bemelmans,et al.  Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[12]  Georg Edelmayer,et al.  Home care robot for socially supporting the elderly: focus group studies in three European countries to screen user attitudes and requirements , 2013, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[13]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Joost van Hoof,et al.  Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  A. Rigaud,et al.  Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting , 2014, Clinical interventions in aging.

[16]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[17]  David Bishai,et al.  Preliminary Data from Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders, a Patient‐Directed, Team‐Based Intervention to Improve Physical Function and Decrease Nursing Home Utilization: The First 100 Individuals to Complete a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Project , 2015, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  Joseph P. Wherton,et al.  What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[19]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .