Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted frictional forces at the foot-ground interface.

Plantar shear stresses are believed to play a major role in diabetic ulceration. Due to the lack of commercial devices that can measure plantar shear distribution, a number of mathematical models have been developed to predict plantar frictional forces. This study assessed the accuracy of these models using a custom-built platform capable of measuring plantar stresses simultaneously. A total of 48 (38 healthy and 10 diabetic) human subjects (75+/-20 kg, 41+/-20 years, 32 males, 16 females) were recruited in the study. Plantar force data were collected for 2s at 50 Hz. Two models (M1 and M2) reported in the literature by different groups were used to predict local shear stresses. Root mean squared errors (RMSE) were calculated to compare model data with the actual data, focusing on three parameters: location, magnitude and timing of peak shear components. RMSE values of estimated peak AP and ML shear locations were 3.1 and 2.2 cm for M1 and 3.1 and 2.1cm for M2, respectively. Magnitude RMS error values for M1 were found to be 86.6 kPa in AP shear and 38.5 kPa in ML shear, whereas these values were determined to be 97.8 and 63.5 kPa, respectively by M2. Time to peak shear RMSE values averaged 17.2% in terms of the gait duration. In conclusion, distribution of plantar shear should be measured rather than predicted, particularly if one is interested in the magnitudes of shear components.

[1]  V Macellari,et al.  Piezo-dynamometric platform for a more complete analysis of foot-to-floor interaction. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  G. Harris,et al.  A kinetic model of the foot and ankle , 1997 .

[3]  Brian L. Davis,et al.  A Device for Simultaneous Measurement of Pressure and Shear Force Distribution on the Plantar Surface of the Foot , 1998 .

[4]  M. G. Pepper,et al.  In-shoe biaxial shear force measurement: The Kent shear system , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Dinsdale Sm,et al.  Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Pollard,et al.  Method of healing diabetic forefoot ulcers. , 1983 .

[7]  J W Tappin,et al.  Method of measuring 'shearing' forces on the sole of the foot , 1980 .

[8]  M. Cornwall,et al.  Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. , 1999, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[9]  D. Armstrong,et al.  The forefoot-to-rearfoot plantar pressure ratio is increased in severe diabetic neuropathy and can predict foot ulceration. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[10]  I Tarawneh,et al.  The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age, sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers , 2001, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  New developments in the biomechanics of the diabetic foot , 2000, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[12]  K A Athanasiou,et al.  Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration? , 1998, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[13]  M Lord,et al.  A study of in-shoe plantar shear in patients with diabetic neuropathy. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  B. Davis,et al.  Visual guidance to force plates does not influence ground reaction force variability. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.