Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark

We report on the main results of a collaborative work devoted to the study of the uncertainties associated with Digital image correlation techniques (DIC). More specifically, the dependence of displacement measurement uncertainties with both image characteristics and DIC parameters is emphasised. A previous work [Bornert et al. (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp. Mech. 49, 353-370] dedicated to situations with spatially fluctuating displacement fields demonstrated the existence of an 'ultimate error' regime, insensitive to the mismatch between the shape function and the real displacement field. The present work is focused on this ultimate error. To ensure that there is no mismatch error, synthetic images of in-plane rigid body translation have been analysed. Several DIC softwares developed by or in use in the French community have been used to explore the effects of a large number of settings. The discrepancies between DIC evaluated displacements and prescribed ones have been statistically analysed in terms of random errors and systematic bias, in correlation with the fractional part τ of the displacement component expressed in pixels. Main results are as follows: (i) bias amplitude is almost always insensitive to subset size, (ii) standard deviation of random error increases with noise level and decreases with subset size and (iii) DIC formulations can be split up into two main families regarding bias sensitivity to noise. For the first one, bias amplitude increases with noise while it remains nearly constant for the second one. In addition, for the first family, a strong dependence of random error with τ is observed for noisy images.

[1]  Gilbert Tribillon,et al.  Measurement of in-plane displacement fields by a spectral phase algorithm applied to numerical speckle photograph for microtensile tests , 2000 .

[2]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[3]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[4]  M. Sutton,et al.  Effects of subpixel image restoration on digital correlation error estimates , 1988 .

[5]  Laurent Robert,et al.  Digital image correlation: displacement accuracy estimation , 2010 .

[6]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .

[7]  François Hild,et al.  Parameter choice for optimized digital image correlation , 2009 .

[8]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Assessment of measuring errors in DIC using deformation fields generated by plastic FEA , 2009 .

[9]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[10]  Mário Vaz,et al.  Cross‐Correlation and Differential Technique Combination to Determine Displacement Fields , 2011 .

[11]  Pascal Doumalin Microextensometrie locale par correlation d'images numeriques application aux etudes micromecaniques par microscopie electronique a balayage , 2000 .

[12]  Phillip L. Reu,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Methods for Exact Subpixel Shifting , 2011 .

[13]  S. Choi,et al.  Measurement of deformations on concrete subjected to compression using image correlation , 1997 .

[14]  Michel Bornert,et al.  Resolution and spatial resolution of digital image correlation techniques , 2006 .

[15]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[16]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[17]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[18]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[19]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of a speckle pattern in the digital image correlation method by mean subset fluctuation , 2011 .

[20]  François Hild,et al.  Full-Field Measurements and Identification in Solid Mechanics: Grédiac/Full-Field Measurements and Identification in Solid Mechanics , 2013 .

[21]  F SeijoFernandez,et al.  Methodology and results of a pain unit , 1986 .

[22]  Dorian Garcia,et al.  A speckle texture image generator , 2006, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[23]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[24]  Eric Lantz,et al.  Subpixel detection of the center of an object using a spectral phase algorithm on the image , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  Xie Huimin,et al.  Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation , 2006 .

[26]  Michel Bornert,et al.  Localized deformation induced by heterogeneities in porous carbonate analysed by multi-scale digital image correlation , 2011 .

[27]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[28]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Stress intensity factor measurements from digital image correlation: post-processing and integrated approaches , 2006 .

[29]  B. Wattrisse,et al.  Analysis of strain localization during tensile tests by digital image correlation , 2001 .

[30]  Vincenzo Vergiani Studies in the Kāśikāvṛtti . The Section on Pratyāhāras : Methodology and Results , 2011 .

[31]  A. Cuitiño,et al.  Full-field measurements of heterogeneous deformation patterns on polymeric foams using digital image correlation , 2002 .

[32]  Jarmo T. Alander,et al.  Deformation image generation for testing a strain measurement algorithm , 2008 .

[33]  Jun Zhang,et al.  On the use of the digital image correlation method for heterogeneous deformation measurement of porous solids , 2011 .