Compensatory responses of articulators to unexpected perturbation of the palate shape

Abstract This paper describes compensatory articulatory behavior in response to an unexpected perturbation of the oral cavity. A mechanical device was used to change dynamically the thickness of an artificial palate; the thickness of the un-inflated artificial palate was increased or the thickness of the already inflated artificial palate was decreased. The palatal perturbations were introduced under conditions of normal and masked auditory feedback. Acoustic, perceptual, and speech movement changes were examined in response to the experimental conditions. An EMA system was used to look for evidence of compensatory articulation during the utterance of repeated CV syllables containing fricative /∫/ and affricate /t∫/. When perturbation by palatal inflation was randomly given just before the initial syllable in the repeated fricative syllable, there was frequent overshoot of the tongue in forming the constriction, causing speech errors in the first syllable with the fricative. Compensation by the tongue for the unexpected palatal inflation became evident around the second syllable and the speech error disappeared in the successive syllables. Even when auditory feedback was masked, rapid compensatory articulation of the tongue was observed around the second syllable, but speech errors randomly occurred in the successive syllables. This fact suggests that tactile feedback gathered by sensing contact between tongue and inflated artificial palate is primarily used to develop the rapid compensation, and that auditory feedback is used in finely adjusting articulation with a longer time lag.

[1]  T. Kaburagi,et al.  Determination of sagittal tongue shape from the positions of points on the tongue surface. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  James Lubker,et al.  Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predict , 1977 .

[3]  S L Hamlet,et al.  Physiological control of sibilant duration: insights afforded by speech compensation to dental prostheses. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D H McFarland,et al.  Compensation to articulatory perturbation: perceptual data. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  TASK DEPENDENT JAW-LIP COORDINATION EXAMINED BY JAW PERTURBATION DURING BILABIAL-CONSONANT UTTERANCES , 2000 .

[7]  G Weismer,et al.  Influences of pellet markers on speech production behavior: acoustical and perceptual measures. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Folkins,et al.  Lip and jaw interaction during speech: responses to perturbation of lower-lip movement prior to bilabial closure. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models , 1997, Speech Commun..

[10]  D H McFarland,et al.  Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Compensating for a bite block in /s/ and /t/ production: palatographic, acoustic, and perceptual data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A Smith,et al.  Reflex responses in human jaw, lip, and tongue muscles elicited by mechanical stimulation. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  Maureen Stone,et al.  Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental prostheses , 1976 .

[14]  M T Turvey,et al.  Immediate Compensation in Bite-Block Speech , 1980, Phonetica.

[15]  J H Abbs,et al.  Lip and jaw motor control during speech: responses to resistive loading of the jaw. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Interactions between speech production and perception under auditory feedback perturbations on fundamental frequencies , 1994 .

[17]  J. Abbs,et al.  Sensorimotor actions in the control of multi-movement speech gestures , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  P. Schönle,et al.  Electromagnetic articulography: Use of alternating magnetic fields for tracking movements of multiple points inside and outside the vocal tract , 1987, Brain and Language.

[19]  M. Stone,et al.  Compensatory alveolar consonant production induced by wearing a dental prosthesis , 1978 .

[20]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M H Cohen,et al.  Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D H McFarland,et al.  Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Abbs,et al.  Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.