The pupillary light response reflects exogenous attention and inhibition of return.

Here we show that the pupillary light response reflects exogenous (involuntary) shifts of attention and inhibition of return. Participants fixated in the center of a display that was divided into a bright and a dark half. An exogenous cue attracted attention to the bright or dark side of the display. Initially, the pupil constricted when the bright, as compared to the dark, side of the display was cued, reflecting a shift of attention toward the exogenous cue. Crucially, this pattern reversed about 1 s after cue presentation. This later-occurring, relative dilation (when the bright side was cued) reflected disengagement from the previously attended location, analogous to the behavioral phenomenon of inhibition of return. Indeed, we observed a reliable correlation between "pupillary inhibition" and behavioral inhibition of return. Our results support the view that inhibition of return results from habituation to (or short-term depression of) visual input. We conclude that the pupillary light response is a complex eye movement that reflects how we selectively parse and interpret visual input.

[1]  B. Laeng,et al.  Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Simon Barthelmé,et al.  Modeling fixation locations using spatial point processes. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[3]  Paola Binda,et al.  Pupil constrictions to photographs of the sun. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[4]  E. Bárány,et al.  Phasic inhibition of the light reflex of the pupil during retinal rivalry. , 1948, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Harms.  Ort und Wesen der Bildhemmung bei Schielenden , 1937, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Ophthalmologie.

[6]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Pupil responses to high-level image content. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[7]  D. Munoz,et al.  Overt Responses during Covert Orienting , 2014, Neuron.

[8]  Club Jules Gonin,et al.  Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology , 1982 .

[9]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[10]  Brian J. White,et al.  Microstimulation of the Monkey Superior Colliculus Induces Pupil Dilation Without Evoking Saccades , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  Dynamics of the pupil during binocular rivalry. , 1966, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[12]  P. Binda,et al.  Pupil size reflects the focus of feature-based attention. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[15]  Mathôt Sebastiaan,et al.  A simple way to reconstruct pupil size during eye blinks , 2013 .

[16]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[17]  J. Grainger,et al.  Object-centered orienting and IOR , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[19]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[20]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Perceptual Rivalry: Reflexes Reveal the Gradual Nature of Visual Awareness , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  F. Vitu,et al.  The pupillary light response reflects eye-movement preparation , 2014 .

[23]  R. Klein,et al.  Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus , 2011, Vision Research.

[24]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Imaginary Light , 2014, Psychological science.

[25]  R. Rafal,et al.  Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989). , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  A. Samuel,et al.  Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The pupillary light response reflects eye-movement preparation. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Fahle,et al.  How Much of the “Unconscious” is Just Pre – Threshold? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..