Application of Surrogate Safety Measures for Assessment of Pedestrian Versus Left-Turning Vehicle Conflict At Signalized Crosswalks

Pedestrian safety improvement at signalized intersections remains a critical issue. The major threat comes from frequent interaction with turning vehicles, especially left-turners (left-hand traffic system). This study gains insights into how surrogate safety measure (SSM) can be utilized for pedestrian versus left-turning vehicle conflict assessment, and although a small step, how to relate SSM to limited crash records for crash risk estimation. Based on the video data collected at several crosswalks in Nagoya City, Japan, SSMs, i.e., Post Encroachment Time (PET) and vehicle passing speed at conflict point were extracted for analysis. PETs were estimated for both near-side and far-side approaching pedestrians by identifying the potential conflict points and considering the physical size of left-turning vehicles. The effectiveness of SSMs to reflect the impact of site-specific geometric characteristics and operational conditions upon conflict risk has been demonstrated. Furthermore, crash risk estimation models were developed by using Poisson regression methods based on mean PET, the number of short PETs per hour and average vehicle passing speed at conflict point at each crosswalk. It demonstrates that high turning speed, in conjunction with higher frequency of short PETs result in higher crash rates.

[1]  S. Cafiso,et al.  Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements: Before and After Study using Traffic Conflict Techniques , 2010 .

[2]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  TrafficAnalyzer - the integrated video image processing system for traffic flow analysis , 2006 .

[3]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[4]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  Estimation of left-turning vehicle maneuvers for the assessment of pedestrian safety at intersections , 2012 .

[5]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  Safety Evaluation for Intergreen Intervals at Signalized Intersections Based on Probabilistic Method , 2009 .

[6]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Dynamic speed adaptation based on information technology - a theoretical background , 1997 .

[7]  Brian L Allen,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND COLLISIONS , 1978 .

[8]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict standards for intersections , 1999 .

[9]  Helena Stigson,et al.  Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[11]  Wael K.M. Alhajyaseen,et al.  Development of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model for Safety Assessment at Signalized Intersections , 2012 .

[12]  Edward T. Harrigan,et al.  NAtioNAl CooperAtive HigHwAy reseArCH progrAm , 2013 .

[13]  P. J. Cooper,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS IN CANADA WITH EMPHASIS ON "POST ENCROACHMENT TIME" TECHNIQUES .INTERNATIONAL CALIBRATION STUDY OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATO ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP , 1984 .

[14]  Praprut Songchitruksa,et al.  The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS IN HIGHWAY SAFETY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[16]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  Left-turn gap acceptance models considering pedestrian movement characteristics. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .