Differentiation of solid benign and malignant breast masses by quantitative analysis of ultrasound images

Although breast sonography is highly accurate at distinguishing solid from cystic lesions, it is less precise when differentiating benign and malignant masses. The goal of this study is to evaluate quantitative methods for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses. Three margin features extracted from B-Mode images, along with age of the patient, were analyzed by logistic regression to classify lesions as malignant or benign. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of each feature individually as well as collectively. In each case, classification performance was evaluated using a leave-one-out cross validation method. The robustness of the diagnostic algorithm was determined by studying effects of sample size and training level on the overall performance of the classifier. The results show that while there was no statistical difference in the size of benign and malignant lesions, the margin characteristics of the masses varied significantly, differentiating the two groups. When all the features were used together, the probability of malignancy for the solid breast masses could be determined with ROC area ranging from 0.83 to 0.89. Diagnostic accuracy was notably influenced by the size of the database, the ratio of malignant to benign lesions, and the training level of the algorithm. Significant diagnostic performance can be attained using margin characteristics of the lesions and logistic regression classifiers.

[1]  Susan M. Schultz,et al.  Computer‐Based Margin Analysis of Breast Sonography for Differentiating Malignant and Benign Masses , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  A Manduca,et al.  Improvement in specificity of ultrasonography for diagnosis of breast tumors by means of artificial intelligence. , 1992, Medical physics.

[3]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[4]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  Dagmar Leucht,et al.  Teaching Atlas of Breast Ultrasound , 1992 .

[7]  M S Soo,et al.  Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  E. Conant,et al.  Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  F Fobbe,et al.  Detection of malignant and benign breast lesions with an automated US system: results in 120 cases. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  I. Ellis,et al.  The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[12]  H. Iwase,et al.  [Breast cancer]. , 2006, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  V. Jackson The role of US in breast imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[14]  V. Jackson Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  T. Shishikura,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound as a predictor of node metastases and prognosis in patients with breast cancer , 2000, Breast cancer.

[16]  Helmut Madjar,et al.  The Practice of Breast Ultrasound: Techniques, Findings, Differential Diagnosis , 2000 .

[17]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B-mode images using a compounding technique in the Nakagami distribution domain. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  E. Conant,et al.  Interreader variability and predictive value of US descriptions of solid breast masses: pilot study. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[19]  P M Shankar,et al.  Computer aided classification of masses in ultrasonic mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[20]  C. Sehgal,et al.  Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[21]  K. Han,et al.  Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. , 2003, Radiology.

[22]  B. Garra,et al.  Improving the Distinction between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: The Value of Sonographic Texture Analysis , 1993 .