TBM/MTM for HTS-FNSF: An Innovative Testing Strategy to Qualify/Validate Fusion Technologies for U.S. DEMO

The qualification and validation of nuclear technologies are daunting tasks for fusion demonstration (DEMO) and power plants. This is particularly true for advanced designs that involve harsh radiation environment with 14 MeV neutrons and high-temperature operating regimes. This paper outlines the unique qualification and validation processes developed in the U.S., offering the only access to the complete fusion environment, focusing on the most prominent U.S. blanket concept (the dual cooled PbLi (DCLL)) along with testing new generations of structural and functional materials in dedicated test modules. The venue for such activities is the proposed Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF), which is viewed as an essential element of the U.S. fusion roadmap. A staged blanket testing strategy has been developed to test and enhance the DCLL blanket performance during each phase of FNSF D-T operation. A materials testing module (MTM) is critically important to include in the FNSF as well to test a broad range of specimens of future, more advanced generations of materials in a relevant fusion environment. The most important attributes for MTM are the relevant He/dpa ratio (10–15) and the much larger specimen volumes compared to the 10–500 mL range available in the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) and European DEMO-Oriented Neutron Source (DONES).

[1]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Options and methods for instrumentation of Test Blanket Systems for experiment control and scientific mission , 2014 .

[2]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Current design of the European TBM systems and implications on DEMO breeding blanket , 2016 .

[3]  Brian D. Wirth,et al.  Recent Developments in Irradiation-Resistant Steels , 2008 .

[4]  L. El‐Guebaly,et al.  In-Vessel Components and Blanket Development Strategy for PPPL Pilot Plant , 2011 .

[5]  Giacomo Aiello,et al.  Development of the Helium Cooled Lithium Lead blanket for DEMO , 2014 .

[6]  Sergey Smolentsev,et al.  Development Status of a SiC-Foam Based Flow Channel Insert for a U.S.-ITER DCLL TBM , 2009 .

[7]  Enric Bargalló,et al.  The accomplishment of the Engineering Design Activities of IFMIF/EVEDA: The European–Japanese project towards a Li(d,xn) fusion relevant neutron source , 2015, 2112.14211.

[8]  Neil B. Morley,et al.  The Fusion Nuclear Science Facility, the Critical Step in the Pathway to Fusion Energy , 2015 .

[9]  G. R. Odette,et al.  Irradiation-tolerant nanostructured ferritic alloys: Transforming helium from a liability to an asset , 2010 .

[10]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Materials RD for a timely DEMO: Key findings and recommendations of the EU Roadmap Materials Assessment Group , 2014 .

[11]  L. El‐Guebaly,et al.  Need for Online Adjustment of Tritium Bred in Blanket and Implications for ARIES Power Plants , 2009 .

[12]  Mark S. Tillack,et al.  Development of the Lead Lithium (DCLL) Blanket Concept , 2011 .

[13]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Fusion Nuclear Science Facility Candidates , 2011 .

[14]  Magnus Rohde,et al.  Development of Sandwich Flow Channel Inserts for an EU DEMO Dual Coolant Blanket Concept , 2015 .

[15]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Progresses and challenges in supporting activities toward a license to operate European TBM systems in ITER , 2014 .

[16]  P. Sardain,et al.  Objectives and status of EUROfusion DEMO blanket studies , 2016 .

[17]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  ST-Based Fusion Nuclear Science Facility: Breeding Issues and Challenges of Protecting HTS Magnets , 2017 .

[18]  J.M. Park,et al.  Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) before Upgrade to Component Test Facility (CTF) , 2010 .

[19]  A. R. Raffraya,et al.  Advanced power core system for the ARIES-AT power plant , 2006 .

[20]  S. Dryepondt,et al.  Development of ODS FeCrAl for Compatibility in Fusion and Fission Energy Applications , 2014 .

[21]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  Fusion nuclear science facilities and pilot plants based on the spherical tokamak , 2016 .

[22]  M. Gadomska,et al.  Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities , 2014 .

[23]  Hisashi Tanigawa,et al.  Japanese endeavors to establish technological bases for DEMO , 2016 .

[24]  E. T. Cheng,et al.  Impurity effects on reduced-activation ferritic steels developed for fusion applications , 2000 .

[25]  Alice Ying,et al.  An overview of the US DCLL ITER-TBM program , 2010 .

[26]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  Configuration Studies for an ST-Based Fusion Nuclear Science Facility , 2014 .

[27]  B. G. Hong,et al.  Overview of ITER TBM program objectives and management , 2018 .

[28]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  Prospects for pilot plants based on the tokamak, spherical tokamak and stellarator , 2011 .

[29]  George H. Neilson,et al.  A preliminary conceptual design study for Korean fusion DEMO reactor , 2013 .

[30]  P. Barabaschi,et al.  A Stepped Approach from IFMIF/EVEDA Toward IFMIF , 2014 .

[31]  J. Menard,et al.  Nuclear Aspects and Blanket Testing/Development Strategy for ST-FNSF , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[32]  T. Muroga,et al.  Multimodal options for materials research to advance the basis for fusion energy in the ITER era , 2013 .

[33]  I. Ricapito,et al.  Tritium breeder blankets design and technologies in Europe: Development status of ITER Test Blanket Modules, test & qualification strategy and roadmap towards DEMO , 2010 .