Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts

Abstract For the fabrication of dental inlays and crowns precise information on patients' teeth morphology is required. Besides the conventional method, where mold materials impressions are prepared, the use of digital scanners is more and more becoming a central part in the nowadays dentistry. The aim of the manuscript is to compare the accuracy of master models based on two intra-oral digital scanners and silicone impressions. A metal cast reference arch model with predefined measurement points was scanned using the Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and the iTero™ Intraoral Scanner respectively. These scans were applied for the fabrication of models using rapid prototyping and milling from a proprietary resin. In addition, plaster models were produced using conventional A-silicone impressions. Using a coordinate measuring machine and a micro computed tomography scanner the models were evaluated with micrometer precision. The mean distance deviations from model to model correspond to 112 μm (C.O.S.), 50 μm (iTero™) and 16 μm (gypsum). The results verified the high precision of the conventional technique based on A-silicone impressions and plaster models. The accuracy of the master models obtained on the basis of the digital scans is clinically sufficient to fabricate bridges with up to four units.

[1]  Roberto Scotti,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  A. Mehl,et al.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[3]  P. Thurner,et al.  An optimization procedure for spatial and density resolution in hard X-ray micro-computed tomography , 2004 .

[4]  P Castellini,et al.  Teeth mobility measurement: a laser vibrometry approach. , 1998, Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery.

[5]  Arun K Garg Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? , 2008, Dental implantology update.

[6]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Non-destructive three-dimensional evaluation of a polymer sponge by micro-tomography using synchrotron radiation. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[7]  A Ender,et al.  Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. , 2013, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[9]  Parag R. Kachalia,et al.  Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. , 2010, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[10]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Three-dimensional strain fields in human brain resulting from formalin fixation , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[12]  Sears Aw,et al.  Hydrocolloid impression technique for inlays and fixed bridges. , 1970 .

[13]  Peter Ottl,et al.  In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[14]  Vollmer,et al.  Klinik- und Praxisführer Zahnmedizin , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel Jeanmonod,et al.  Strain fields in histological slices of brain tissue determined by synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  R. Lakes,et al.  Effect of storage time on the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[17]  W. Mörmann The evolution of the CEREC system. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  Yijin Ren,et al.  Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  H. Rudolph,et al.  Performance of dental impression materials: Benchmarking of materials and techniques by three-dimensional analysis. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[20]  A W Sears,et al.  Hydrocolloid impression technique for inlays and fixed bridges. , 1975, The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika.

[21]  Francisco Martínez-Rus,et al.  Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[22]  T. Bormann,et al.  Three-dimensional registration of tomography data for quantification in biomaterials science , 2012 .

[23]  Werner H. Moörmann The evolution of the CEREC system , 2006 .

[24]  Giuseppe Varvara,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  Andreas Syrek,et al.  Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.