s tandard and r educed r adiation Dose liver cT images: Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction versus Model-based Iterative Reconstruction—Comparison of

[1]  D. Volders,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. , 2013, Radiology.

[2]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Assessment of a Model-Based, Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (MBIR) Regarding Image Quality and Dose Reduction in Liver Computed Tomography , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Varut Vardhanabhuti,et al.  Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[6]  M. Körner,et al.  Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography During the Late Hepatic Arterial Phase Using a Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: How Low Can We Go? , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[9]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  Comparison of Hybrid and Pure Iterative Reconstruction Techniques With Conventional Filtered Back Projection: Dose Reduction Potential in the Abdomen , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique , 2012, European Radiology.

[11]  Sebastian Feuerlein,et al.  New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[12]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Fast Model-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction Using Spatially Nonhomogeneous ICD Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Orpheus Kolokythas,et al.  Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.