Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

CONTEXT Despite the large diffusion of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), literature and data on the oncologic outcome of RARP are limited. OBJECTIVE Evaluate lymph node yield, positive surgical margins (PSMs), use of adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival following RARP and perform a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing the oncologic outcomes of RARP and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 11.0 SE software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrieved 79 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. The mean PSM rate was 15% in all comers and 9% in pathologically localized cancers, with some tumor characteristics being the most relevant predictors of PSMs. Several surgeon-related characteristics or procedure-related issues may play a major role in PSM rates. With regard to BCR, the very few papers with a follow-up duration >5 yr demonstrated 7-yr BCR-free survival estimates of approximately 80%. Finally, all the cumulative analyses comparing RARP with RRP and comparing RARP with LRP demonstrated similar overall PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: odds ratio [OR]: 1.21; p=0.19; RARP vs LRP: OR: 1.12; p=0.47), pT2 PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: OR: 1.25; p=0.31; RARP vs LRP: OR: 0.99; p=0.97), and BCR-free survival estimates (RARP vs RRP: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.9; p=0.526; RARP vs LRP: HR: 0.5; p=0.141), regardless of the surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS PSM rates are similar following RARP, RRP, and LRP. The few data available on BCR from high-volume centers are promising, but definitive comparisons with RRP or LRP are not currently possible. Finally, significant data on cancer-specific mortality are not currently available.

[1]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. , 2009, The Canadian journal of urology.

[2]  J. G. P. Arias,et al.  Prostatectomía radical: comparación de los resultados obtenidos durante las curvas de aprendizaje de la técnica laparoscópica pura y de la técnica asistida por robot con la prostatectomía radical retropúbica , 2008 .

[3]  R. Ghavamian,et al.  Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. , 2009, Urology.

[4]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics. , 2009, Urology.

[5]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Combination of adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapy significantly prolongs survival of patients with pT2-4 pN+ prostate cancer: results of a matched analysis. , 2011, European urology.

[6]  Arieh L. Shalhav,et al.  Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2009, Urology.

[7]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  A. Costello,et al.  EARLY ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOT‐ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR HIGH‐GRADE PROSTATE CANCER , 2011, BJU international.

[9]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Lallas,et al.  Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. , 2010, Urologic oncology.

[11]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[12]  M. White,et al.  Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? , 2009, Urology.

[13]  F. Kim.  Does prior abdominal surgery influence outcomes or complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? , 2010 .

[14]  Jinsung Park,et al.  Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. , 2011, European urology.

[15]  S D Walter,et al.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. , 2009, Urology.

[17]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. , 2009, Urology.

[18]  Md. Mizanur Rahman,et al.  Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years , 2010, BJU international.

[19]  A. Tewari,et al.  Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk‐stratified approach to neural‐hammock sparing during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) , 2011, BJU international.

[20]  K. To,et al.  Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. , 2010, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[21]  Wei Huang,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[22]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[23]  T. Wilson,et al.  Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? , 2011, Current opinion in urology.

[24]  F. Bruyère,et al.  Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial , 2012, BJU international.

[25]  B. Spencer.  Utilization and expense of adjuvant cancer therapies following radical prostatectomy , 2011, Cancer.

[26]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2010, BJU international.

[27]  E. Barret,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. , 2008, Urology.

[28]  A. Tewari,et al.  Optimizing vesicourethral anastomosis healing after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from three techniques in 1900 patients. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[29]  M. Kattan,et al.  Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique. , 2008, European urology.

[30]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Determinants of performing radical prostatectomy pelvic lymph node dissection and the number of lymph nodes removed in elderly men. , 2011, Urology.

[31]  Thomas Wiegel,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. , 2011, European urology.

[32]  P. Carroll,et al.  Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot‐assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy , 2010, BJU international.

[33]  V. Patel,et al.  Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. , 2008, Anticancer research.

[34]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. , 2009, European urology.

[35]  Y. Choi,et al.  Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[36]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[37]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Trifecta outcomes after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2011, BJU international.

[38]  M. Menon,et al.  Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. , 2010, European urology.

[39]  B. Linder,et al.  "Learning curve" may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[40]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. , 2012, European urology.

[41]  V. Ficarra,et al.  A prospective, non‐randomized trial comparing robot‐assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution , 2009, BJU international.

[42]  J. P. Pereira Arias,et al.  [Radical prostatectomy: evaluation of learning curve outcomes laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques with radical retropubic prostatectomy]. , 2008, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[43]  H. Klingler,et al.  FloSeal reduces the incidence of lymphoceles after lymphadenectomies in laparoscopic and robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[44]  K. Badani,et al.  Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[45]  Filippo Annino,et al.  Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[46]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. , 2009, JAMA.

[47]  Shady Salem,et al.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[48]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[49]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center. , 2011, European urology.

[50]  M. Menon,et al.  Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[51]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2011, Urology.

[52]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years , 2012 .

[53]  V. Laudone,et al.  Does prior abdominal surgery influence outcomes or complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? , 2010, Urology.

[54]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[55]  K. Palmer,et al.  Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. , 2009, European urology.

[56]  A. Partin,et al.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic‐assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching , 2011, BJU international.

[57]  J. Cashy,et al.  Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2010, BJU international.

[58]  Michael Kerger,et al.  Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. , 2009, European urology.

[59]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Robot‐assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience in a high‐volume laparoscopy reference centre , 2010, BJU international.

[60]  J. Moul,et al.  Comparison of prostate‐specific antigen recurrence‐free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[61]  L. Stitt,et al.  Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[62]  D. Wood,et al.  The impact of anterior urethropexy during robotic prostatectomy on urinary and sexual outcomes. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[63]  W. Jeong,et al.  Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Pathologic T2 Disease , 2010, Korean journal of urology.

[64]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. , 2011, European Urology.

[65]  J. Thrasher,et al.  Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[66]  G. Wilding,et al.  Apical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does technique matter? , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[67]  Hugh J. Lavery,et al.  High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2010, The Canadian journal of urology.

[68]  A. Mottrie,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control , 2011, Current opinion in urology.

[69]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[70]  J. Engel,et al.  Oncologic outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in the high-risk setting. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[71]  Usha Kreaden,et al.  Visual cues as a surrogate for tactile feedback during robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: posterolateral margin rates in 1340 consecutive patients , 2010, BJU international.

[72]  M. Rubin,et al.  Anatomical retro‐apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy , 2010, BJU international.

[73]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[74]  Mehrdad Alemozaffar,et al.  Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. , 2011, European urology.

[75]  H. Danuser,et al.  A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. , 2011, European urology.

[76]  R. Nelson,et al.  The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[77]  Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler,et al.  Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer , 2009, World Journal of Urology.

[78]  Y. Choi,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer is feasible: results of a single-institution study. , 2009, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[79]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. , 2011, European urology.

[80]  Vipul R Patel,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[81]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[82]  D. Samadi,et al.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Outcomes of 700 Cases , 2009, International journal of biomedical science : IJBS.

[83]  D. Schmid,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases. , 2009, European urology.

[84]  H. Sax,et al.  An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Urology.

[85]  Y. Choi,et al.  Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Experience of 200 Cases , 2008 .

[86]  M. Blute,et al.  Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot‐assisted techniques , 2009, BJU international.

[87]  J. Epstein,et al.  Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparative Analysis of Sampling Methods , 1992, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[88]  Howard Jung,et al.  Impact of robotic training on surgical and pathologic outcomes during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Urology.

[89]  G. Sung,et al.  Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Surgeon's Experience , 2009 .

[90]  C. Abbou,et al.  889 EVALUATION OF COMBINED ONCOLOGIC AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: TRIFECTA RATE OF ACHIEVING CONTINENCE, POTENCY AND CANCER CONTROL , 2011 .

[91]  K. Palmer,et al.  Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[92]  John W. Davis,et al.  Initial experience of teaching robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons‐in‐training: can training be evaluated and standardized? , 2010, BJU international.

[93]  David C. Miller,et al.  Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? , 2010, Urology.

[94]  Stefano Cavalleri,et al.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. , 2007, European urology.

[95]  Hugh J. Lavery,et al.  Improvements in robot-assisted prostatectomy: the effect of surgeon experience and technical changes on oncologic and functional outcomes. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[96]  M. Rouprêt,et al.  Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[97]  D. Ornstein,et al.  Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors , 2008, BJU international.

[98]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Decreasing rate and extent of lymph node staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may undermine the rate of diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. , 2010, European urology.

[99]  Nadeem N. Dhanani,et al.  Significance of prostate weight on peri and postoperative outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. , 2010, The Canadian journal of urology.

[100]  J. Heldt,et al.  Patients with end-stage renal disease are candidates for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[101]  David I. Lee,et al.  2023 THE SURGICAL LEARNING CURVE FOR ROBOTIC PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY , 2010 .

[102]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL evaluation. , 2010, European urology.

[103]  M. Menon,et al.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. , 2009, European urology.

[104]  D. Albala,et al.  Does body mass index have an impact on the rate and location of positive surgical margins following robot assisted radical prostatectomy? , 2012, Urologic oncology.

[105]  B. Jeong,et al.  Comparative assessment of a single surgeon's series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted. , 2011, Journal of endourology.