Rotaphone-CY: The Newest Rotaphone Model Design and Preliminary Results from Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources

Rotaphone-CY is a six-component short-period seismograph that is capable of the co-located recording of three translational (ground velocity) components along three orthogonal axes and three rotational (rotation rate) components around the three axes in one device. It is a mechanical sensor system utilizing records from elemental sensors (geophones) arranged in parallel pairs to derive differential motions in the pairs. The pairs are attached to a rigid frame that is anchored to the ground. The model design, the latest one among various Rotaphone designs based on the same principle and presented elsewhere, is briefly introduced. The upgrades of the new model are a 32-bit A/D converter, a more precise placing of the geophones to parallel pairs and a better housing, which protects the instrument from external electromagnetic noise. The instrument is still in a developmental stage. It was tested in a field experiment that took place at the Geophysical Observatory in Fürstenfeldbruck (Germany) in November 2019. Four Rotaphones-CY underwent the huddle-testing phase of the experiment as well as the field-deployment phase, in which the instruments were installed in a small-aperture seismic array of a triangular shape. The preliminary results from this active-source experiment are shown. Rotaphone-CY data are verified, in part, by various approaches: mutual comparison of records from four independent Rotaphone-CY instruments, waveform matching according to rotation-to-translation relations, and comparison to array-derived rotations when applicable. The preliminary results are very promising and they suggest the good functionality of the Rotaphone-CY design. It has been proved that the present Rotaphone-CY model is a reliable instrument for measuring short-period seismic rotations of the amplitudes as small as 10−7 rad/s.

[1]  A. T. Ringler,et al.  Observations of Rotational Motions from Local Earthquakes Using Two Temporary Portable Sensors in Waynoka, Oklahoma , 2018, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Rotaphone, a mechanical seismic sensor system for field rotation rate measurements and its in situ calibration , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[3]  Johana Brokešová,et al.  Comparative Measurements of Local Seismic Rotations by Three Independent Methods , 2020, Sensors.

[4]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Measurements of translation, rotation and strain: new approaches to seismic processing and inversion , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[5]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Rotaphone, a Self‐Calibrated Six‐Degree‐of‐Freedom Seismic Sensor and Its Strong‐Motion Records , 2013 .

[6]  Asher Flaws,et al.  Rotational motions induced by the M8.1 Tokachi‐oki earthquake, September 25, 2003 , 2005 .

[7]  Karl Ulrich Schreiber,et al.  Invited review article: Large ring lasers for rotation sensing. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[8]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  First Comparison of Array-Derived Rotational Ground Motions with Direct Ring Laser Measurements , 2006 .

[9]  J. Málek,et al.  Seismic structure beneath the Reykjanes Peninsula, southwest Iceland, inferred from array-derived Rayleigh wave dispersion , 2019, Tectonophysics.

[10]  Jon B. Fletcher,et al.  Erratum to Observation and Prediction of Dynamic Ground Strains, Tilts, and Torsions Caused by the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake and Aftershocks, Derived from UPSAR Array Observations , 2008 .

[11]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Can we estimate local Love wave dispersion properties from collocated amplitude measurements of translations and rotations? , 2010 .

[12]  J. Málek,et al.  Six-degree-of-freedom near-source seismic motions I: rotation-to-translation relations and synthetic examples , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[13]  Leszek R. Jaroszewicz,et al.  Usefulness of AFORS—autonomous fibre-optic rotational seismograph for investigation of rotational phenomena , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[14]  Heiner Igel,et al.  BlueSeis3A: Full Characterization of a 3C Broadband Rotational Seismometer , 2018 .

[15]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Transient stresses at Parkfield, California, produced by the M 7.4 Landers earthquake of June 28, 1992: Observations from the UPSAR dense seismograph array , 1995 .

[16]  Jan Kodet,et al.  Reconstruction of the Instantaneous Earth Rotation Vector with Sub-Arcsecond Resolution Using a Large Scale Ring Laser Array. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[17]  Jon B. Fletcher,et al.  Observation and Prediction of Dynamic Ground Strains, Tilts, and Torsions Caused by the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake and Aftershocks, Derived from UPSAR Array ObservationsDynamic Ground Strains, Tilts, and Torsions Caused by the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake , 2008 .

[18]  J. Málek,et al.  Small-aperture-array translational and rotational seismograms from distant sources – An example of the Jan Mayen Mw 6.8 of 30 August 2012 earthquake , 2016 .

[19]  J. Málek,et al.  Note: rotaphone, a new self-calibrated six-degree-of-freedom seismic sensor. , 2012, Review of Scientific Instruments.

[20]  Johana Brokesová,et al.  New portable sensor system for rotational seismic motion measurements. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[21]  Eric Hand,et al.  Lord of the rings. , 2017, Science.

[22]  Frank L. Vernon,et al.  Ring Laser Measurements of Ground Rotations for Seismology , 2009 .

[23]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Measurements of Rotational Events Generated by Artificial Explosions and External Excitations Using the Optical Fiber Sensors Network , 2020, Sensors.

[24]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Rotational Seismology and Engineering Applications , 2009 .

[25]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Laboratory and Field Testing of Commercial Rotational Seismometers , 2009 .

[26]  Zbigniew Zembaty,et al.  Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources , 2021, Sensors.

[27]  P. Spudich,et al.  Observation and Prediction of Dynamic Ground Strains, Tilts and Torsions Caused by the M6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake and Aftershocks Derived From UPSAR Array Observations , 2008 .

[28]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Six-degree-of-freedom near-source seismic motions II: examples of real seismogram analysis and S-wave velocity retrieval , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[29]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Sensitivity Densities for Rotational Ground-Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[30]  Jan Kodet,et al.  ROMY: A Multi-Component Ring Laser for Geodesy and Geophysics , 2020 .

[31]  Asher Flaws,et al.  Broad-band observations of earthquake-induced rotational ground motions , 2007 .

[32]  G. Stedman,et al.  Ring-laser tests of fundamental physics and geophysics , 1997 .

[33]  H. Igel,et al.  Preface to special issue on "Advances in rotational seismology: instrumentation, theory, observations and engineering" , 2012 .

[34]  A. Pancha,et al.  Ring laser detection of rotations from teleseismic waves , 2000 .

[35]  John R. Evans.  Suggested notation conventions for rotational seismology , 2009 .